
Originally Posted by
Alberel
Depending on how the Ascian influence of the Archbishop plays out I won't be surprised if Aymeric ends up taking full control of Ishgard by the end of 3.0.
Honestly, I'll be more surprised if Aymeric doesn't turn out to be an enemy by the end of 3.xx. We already had a relatively obvious traitor in our midst when it came to Ilberd, so it would make sense as well that there would be one who's less obvious also working behind our backs. Not to mention that Aymeric has been frankly a little too helpful when compared to other members of Ishgard, particularly for a high ranking member of their religion based government. Despite his assurances of why he's being so helpful exactly, and why he isn't as uptight as we've been shown other Ishgardians are, it still seems suspicious that he would show up when his assistance would be the most useful. Him asking for a favor from us and going out of his way to reinforce good will with us seems like far more measures than one in his position would take without more reason than he's letting on. Then there's the matter of him being called away immediately prior to 2.55's ending of the banquet. That he would be called away just in time to avoid any danger from the major plot points seems a bit suspicious. Especially given that from a story telling standpoint there was no particular reason he had to be called away at that moment for the Dravanian war, when he could have simply left the area at the same time as the Admiral and Elder Seed-Seer for the same reasons they did....
Of course, this could just be my paranoia acting up....