Thread: Ultra-comprehesive 1.19 notes

Dev posts and Lodestone updates have given interesting details on some 1.19 task list points. I thought you were trying to make a more comprehensive list of 1.19 adjustments, replacing previously vague statements (example: UI adjustments) with revealed details.

I'm not sure I understand your logic and reasoning behind omitting half the picture, but merging your list of details with the key points from the task list made me realize even more the importance and size of 1.19.

Originally Posted by Chinook

Dev posts and Lodestone updates have given interesting details on some 1.19 task list points. I thought you were trying to make a more comprehensive list of 1.19 adjustments, replacing previously vague statements (example: UI adjustments) with revealed details.

I'm not sure I understand your logic and reasoning behind omitting half the picture, but merging your list of details with the key points from the task list made me realize even more the importance and size of 1.19.

He said english wasn't his first language so he either didn't know the correct words to use or misunderstood the meanings most likely.

When I read "Ultra Comprehensive 1.19 Patch Notes" i assumed that this topic would be an attempt to mimic the 1.19 patch notes before they came out. This means including EVERYTHING such as the word comprehensive means, which again points at him not natively speaking english.

Also 3 errors on the OP

Grand company seals displayed on menu- You can already view these on the menu, I believe the post you got this from was referring to making "Guardian's Aspect" and "Guildleve Faction Points" viewable on the menu.

#2 and #3

•Removal of secundary skill requirement
•Removal of facilitys requirement

These are just plain incorrect statements - They should read as follows

•Removal of secundary skill requirement on new recipes only
•Removal of facilitys requirement on new recipes only

All old recipes (read: unchanged recipes) will still require support, secondary skills, and books until they are totally removed in 1.20 - I think the post that mentions this states they are going to find a new use for them rather than remove them also.

Attaching mor than one materia on a single item will carry the posibility of destroy item/materia/catalist

I'm just nitpicking, but could this be reworded to:

"'Forbidden Materia' crafting for attaching 5 pieces of materia at a time. Failure will result in the loss of the item, materia and catalyst."


While I doubt it will matter to many people, reading over the point seemed like it could vaguely suggest that with 5 materia on it the item could break at any point. I'd just rather not have any confusion if someone didn't know this already. ^^

Great list overall, thanks for posting it!

Originally Posted by Narctiss

I'm just nitpicking, but could this be reworded to:

"'Forbidden Materia' crafting for attaching 5 pieces of materia at a time. Failure will result in the loss of the item, materia and catalyst."


While I doubt it will matter to many people, reading over the point seemed like it could vaguely suggest that with 5 materia on it the item could break at any point. I'd just rather not have any confusion if someone didn't know this already. ^^

Great list overall, thanks for posting it!

Failure during crafting. Crafted items don't randomly fail/break in the field.