Why Removing Houses from inactive is NOT a solution.

[Syrehn]

Our point is that SE is wrong. This "solution" will have NO impact on housing availability for the vast majority of players, because the housing system at its core remains fundamentally flawed.

Your opinion is that SE is wrong; which you are of course entitled to. You don't know how it will turn out, in fact none of us do, since the system isn't even out yet and none of us know the full details behind it. You don't honestly think that SE is moving forward with this choice without doing substantial internal research into and how it may/may not affect the current population do you?

SE is working out stratagems for their current housing structure because they have no intentions of changing the system regardless of how flawed you think it is. Those of us that advocate for these changes (e.g. a decay timer) do so knowing that it won't give everyone a house but we understand the value in keeping the existing structures wards full with active players (it's a recycle system) and not having SE spend needless money on servers for additional wards when the current ones are half dead. Couple the inactive housing removal with the house sharing feature and they are steps in the right direction for the current housing model.