Why Removing Houses from inactive is NOT a solution.

[Madjames]

I never played, but were houses in Ultima Online as invested as FFXIV houses in terms of money needed? There is a huge investment in my house (over 5 months of work for a large) and if I lost it I would be very sad.

Also, is taking a system from a game made in 1997 really the best way to go? That is almost 20 years ago, surely we can come up with more fair solutions in today's day and age.

It took me 4 years in that game to get enough money to buy a castle. When I quit for WOW back in 2004 I lost it after I didn't come back after a month. Sorry but life isn't fair and I would NOT EXPECT EA to cater to someone who may or may not return by letting them keep an in game feature that is limited and SHOULD ONLY BE for paying subscribers.

If some people want to whine and complain about a time limit go ahead. I have never missed a subscription payment since I as 10 years old out of my own money (I am 30 now and never missed a sub payment)

SE should have a housing time limit on subscriptions. If you continue to pay you keep your house. If you stop paying, you lose it after a month end of story.

In uo you needed to physically log in and open your house door to refresh your house from decaying and it going bye bye.