Wait a minute...is this a plot-hole (Austerities of Wind and Main Scenario-related)?

[WyrahFhurrst]

Alright then, so that still leaves the question on how one aetheric construct is considered a primal and another isn't. Seems like my basic theory has been off on the wrong track this whole time. Though I will insist common elements are definite like the risks involved with solo summoning, it seems it's time to review and rework. And to think this was my grand thesis on primals too.

It's only called an Egi to reference the fact that it's smaller than the full primal, and under the Summoner's control. And you're very likely correct about the solo summoning, at least as we are now Summoners would have no hope summoning a full primal without perhaps the full power of a limit break (and then it's still questionable). So don't lose hope! And keep working on your theory, it has its merits. The idea of differentiating the summoning methods is good, but it's important that those who can poke holes do, so that the theory can be more elaborative and precise.

[Kaiser-Ace]

It's only called an Egi to reference the fact that it's smaller than the full primal, and under the Summoner's control. And you're very likely correct about the solo summoning, at least as we are now Summoners would have no hope summoning a full primal without perhaps the full power of a limit break (and then it's still questionable). So don't lose hope! And keep working on your theory, it has its merits. The idea of differentiating the summoning methods is good, but it's important that those who can poke holes do, so that the theory can be more elaborative and precise.

Not losing hope. I always look forward to hole poking because it tells me where to rework my theory. So any time it gets shot down that just puts us all that much closer to finding the truth.