bottleneck performance?

[Judge_Xero]

@Luna - Nice.

I think I will play around with higher Ram frequencies to see if I get better performance as well.

Maybe the character rendering is system memory bandwidth limited and not the API at all.

Or maybe it just takes higher bandwidth to collect the character info and to feed the GPU that info.

(Your Ram @ 2666 Mhz is 65% faster than mine and you FPS is about the same. You normally don't have that sort of scaling with Ram unless there is a bottleneck)

[einzele]

Sigh x2




If you dont want to believe that this game can run at 60fps on maximum settings its your problem.

no, i want to believe hence why i make this thread. your previous screenshots didnt tell the whole story, but now they do. u cant just assume everyone is on the same setting as yours can u?
now that we're at it, tell us how did u get that fps?
sure my fps is at the lower end, but everyone else except you are nowhere close to 60 either.
iirc your spec is i7 4790k with gtx 980?

[Pseudopsia]

Sigh x2

If you dont want to believe that this game can run at 60fps on maximum settings its your problem.

Can you do one more test and I'll 100% believe you? Go to top gate, zoom out like screen shot below. What is fps?

[LunaSnowfield]

Can you do one more test and I'll 100% believe you? Go to top gate, zoom out like screen shot below. What is fps?

sup

[Pseudopsia]

sup

I believe you. I like to find out why, may be population difference on servers or mine is done during prime time. Two generation difference between processors can't double the performance. I'm using 16 GB of 2400Mhz DDR3 on my system.

[LunaSnowfield]

I believe you. I like to find out why, may be population difference on servers or mine is done during prime time. Two generation difference between processors can't double the performance. I'm using 16 GB of 2400Mhz DDR3 on my system.

My old computer was a I7 950 3.0 (stock speed) with a GTX 760 and in 1080p i was getting around 15-30fps in cities (specially mordhona). a few months ago i got a i7 4790k with the same GTX 760 and then my fps improved from 15-30 to 45-55.

This game doesnt need a extreme powerful card.

[GenJoe]

This game doesnt need a extreme powerful card.

Damn it!! That goes against every fiber of my gamer being!!

I intentionally have a cheap ass cpu (G3258) with a decent gpu (R9 270X) and FF14 has to be the ONE game that throws the curveball at me

[MiniTofu]

This is normal

Summer Time Setting:
3930k 6 cores 12 threads @ 3.8Ghz (50'c)
GTX TITAN 1050Mhz (41'c)



Winter Time Setting:
3930k 6 cores 12 threads @ 4.6Ghz (60'c)
GTX TITAN 1200Mhz (45'c)

Don't have the image but running at 45FPS.


Keep in mind OP, GTX TITAN > GTX 970 I would have a bit more FPS than yours.

Low temp, entire rig is under watercool.

[Pseudopsia]

My old computer was a I7 950 3.0 (stock speed) with a GTX 760 and in 1080p i was getting around 15-30fps in cities (specially mordhona). a few months ago i got a i7 4790k with the same GTX 760 and then my fps improved from 15-30 to 45-55.

This game doesnt need a extreme powerful card.

Bloomfield was quite weak and didn't overclock that well. I'm using a 6 core sandy bridge that I have clock at 4.6Ghz, which was quite a jump from previous generation. Newer generations CPUs only had around 10% increments in performance and didn't overclock any better.

I plan to upgrade to Skylake in the fall.

[MiniTofu]

What I really want is FFXIV at least implement DX12 support for the load-balancing on CPU. Right now the game runs at 100% one of my 12 threads. Which is not efficient at all.

Most DX11 GPU should be able to support DX12 as said by many articles and reports.