Results 1 to 10 of 11

Hybrid View

  1. 09-09-2011 11:30 PM #1
    Shyd
    Player
    Shyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    601
    Character
    Shyd Etine
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by MattyWS View Post
    Well there is a plus side to this, at the moment it's 8 every 36 hours, now it's going to be 12 every 36 hours kinda. I think it will serve to annoy people who are 'addicted'* to playing and compulsively need to do the leves as they come or they feel that they are missing out, and instead of being able to grab 12 every day and half, you have to be logging on every 12 hours to only be able to do 4.

    *I don't normally believe gaming addiction is out of control, but in some cases a kinda OCD will kick in too. I have studied this sort of thing, not that I'm addicted myself. ^^
    Actually you have 16 leves every 36 hours. The new system will give 4 every 12 hours. You can use those allowances to obtain leves of the Battle, Field, Faction, and Local variety.

    We are losing like 4 leves in this transition every 36 hours. Though we have the decision to either get any type of leve we want. We could get 16 field and 2 Local if we have that many allowances saved up.
    (2)

    Vicious Linkshell
    www.viciouslinkshell.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 09-10-2011 12:33 AM #2
    Xatsh
    Player
    Xatsh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Uldah
    Posts
    2,011
    Character
    Xatsh Vei
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 90
    This is a twist on the changing it back to 48hr system, seems sorta ok to me.

    It is going to make something easier to level now since you can pour all your leves into 1 thing now instead of being forced into 8 fighting/gathering and 8 crafting... now you can just put in 12 into fighting per 36hrs. So faster leveling now on 1 type of class (if you spend say everything on battle leves), slower overall since we are losing 4 leves per 36hrs.
    (0)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »