[dev1134] Guildleve Revisions

[Krausus]

go read it again, you obviously didnt read the update right

• Players will receive an allowance of four leves every 12 hours (Earth time), up to maximum of 99.
• The allowance will be shared amongst regional, local, and faction leves.

do the math you cant do more then 8 in a 36 hour period, just because you can pick up four more on the 36th hour doesn't mean you can do them within that 36 hours.

Bullet 2 leads me to believe that all leves will share the 4 max between them

[TheVedis]

• Players will receive an allowance of four leves every 12 hours (Earth time), up to maximum of 99.
• The allowance will be shared amongst regional, local, and faction leves.

do the math you cant do more then 8 in a 36 hour period, just because you can pick up four more on the 36th hour doesn't mean you can do them within that 36 hours.

Bullet 2 leads me to believe that all leves will share the 4 max between them

your math is still off

you should also count hour 0 as the starter and you get 4 at that point

so you basicaly can do 4 within each 12 hour period, not 4 after each 12 hours has passed is a more accurate way of looking at it


cuz obviously, using your way of thinking, you could do 0 per 36 hours under the current way it works

since from hour 0-36 you cant do any leves, but you earn 16 after 36 hours you can do, but the 36 hours are up so they dont count(hence why you have to count hour 0)

[Arcell]

• Players will receive an allowance of four leves every 12 hours (Earth time), up to maximum of 99.
• The allowance will be shared amongst regional, local, and faction leves.

do the math you cant do more then 8 in a 36 hour period, just because you can pick up four more on the 36th hour doesn't mean you can do them within that 36 hours.

Bullet 2 leads me to believe that all leves will share the 4 max between them

4 per 12 hours. 36/12 = 3. 3 X 4 = 12

4 leves per reset (12 hours). 3 resets per 36 hours. 12 leves per 36 hours. You can pick up 12 leves every 36 hours, no one's counting the time it takes to do them since they store up to 99.

[Krausus]

doh yeah your right =P my bad

[Pulseczar]

I like it. I'll no longer have the pressure to keep up with every leve cycle.

[Aion]

so if it happens I cant play for a week then I get 56 leves to burn,lol, I like it

[Seirra_Lanzce]

^ that what im thinking, like every 12 hour cycle i will keep on collecting and colelcting then burn everything on the weekend. that is so awesome.. but, yea i dont really understand what it says...

[Shneibel]

lost 4 quest /36h but dont have to "force to do it and rush because its time" , I do like the idea, no more force to do this and that because its time, and with the 12h/reset it will fit every timezone....but what is the maxium of 99 ? does it mean you can save the quest /12h and do it at another time ?

ninja edit: crafting will be a bit easy now, 8/36 will be 8/24 ^^

[Chardrizard]

lost 4 quest /36h but dont have to "force to do it and rush because its time" , I do like the idea, no more force to do this and that because its time, and with the 12h/reset it will fit every timezone....but what is the maxium of 99 ? does it mean you can save the quest /12h and do it at another time ?

yes, you can take a week off and have 28 leves to do by sunday,

[Estellios]

@Seirra:

This is the gist of it, somebody correct me if I'm wrong:

You get 4 slots every 12 hours, max of 99 slots.

Available Leves reset every time you complete or fail a leve or when that 12 hour timer resets.

You accumulate leves on your history list, up to 8, that can be cleared with an evaluation that gives you a new guildleve with boosted rewards based on how many were in your history (I'm guessing its something like a bonus crafting leve if it was all/mostly craft leves, for example).

You can retry a failed leve immediately at the counter, journal or through a popup if it's a craft leve, at the aetheryte if its a regional. Each retry consumes 1 of your "slots".

@Devs: Does this mean we're getting new guildleves finally? =) The wording makes these evaluations sound like they're new.