Page 16 of 35 FirstFirst ... 6 14 15 16 17 18 26 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 347
  1. #151
    Player
    Imoye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    285
    Character
    Onywen Fraelia
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Zephyr-Umbra View Post
    A little disappointed since i have a top of the range r9 290X, saphire edition factory OC version.
    But with the Nvidia logo on the benchmark itself i can only imagine they got more of a hands on than AMD did, hopefully AMD cards will get better with it over time.
    Also bare in mind my drivers are quite out of date due to the version of windows im running, which wont allow me to update to the latest or windows 8.1 (Waiting for windows 10.)
    And my CPU is not overclocked either.
    This certainly seems to be the case. People with comparable Nvidia cards are getting better scores.
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaSnowfield View Post
    Okay this must be a **** joke

    System expect :

    I7 4790k 4.0 Ghz
    Evga GTX 980 SC
    SSD Samsung PRO 850 256GB.
    Asus Maximus Ranger VII
    Drivers updated.

    And im getting between 55-57 fps with 7k score?

    Idk, the benchmark seems unreliable, or someone's cheating uknowingly or knowingly for all I know. My friend with a 770 got a 8k score, so you should be above that.
    (0)
    Last edited by Imoye; 04-28-2015 at 03:34 AM.

  2. #152
    Player
    Mimiface's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    7
    Character
    Mimi Face
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Imoye View Post
    How is this even remotely possible? People with a 760 setup are getting less.

    Got 3770k + 7950 @ 1GHz and I'm getting 6355. Seems to be very inconsistent, and somewhat in favour of Nvidia.

    If I downclock my card to 850MHz I get 5551, which should be more comparable to stock 660/670/760 setups.

    Seems to be in favor of Nvidia indeed. Probably optimized better for it
    (0)

  3. #153
    Player
    Mimiface's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    7
    Character
    Mimi Face
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaSnowfield View Post
    Okay this must be a **** joke

    System expect :

    I7 4790k 4.0 Ghz
    Evga GTX 980 SC
    SSD Samsung PRO 850 256GB.
    Asus Maximus Ranger VII
    Drivers updated.

    And im getting between 55-57 fps with 7k score? meanwhile some people with a Celeron D and a GT 5200 are getting over 80 fps on 1080p...

    From what I seen from other 980 users, you should be getting 12000+ easy. Yours is the lowest one I've seen by far
    (0)

  4. #154
    Player
    Bloody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    295
    Character
    Arkain Stormfury
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Dragoon Lv 60
    I did a test this morning on DX9 maximum 1280 results for an 8k score, then found the resolution setting and changed it to 1600 for the DX11 test on maximum and got a 5600ish. Nvidia GTX 750 Ti. I'll retest DX9 at 1600 when I get home from work.
    (0)
    Pro DPS tactic: Big glowing orange AOE = "Stand here to boost your DPS!"
    ~Non Requiem Aeternum~

  5. #155
    Player
    Ditto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    557
    Character
    Echo Sindria
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 70
    GPU: GTX 970 G1 Gaming Edition
    CPU: AMD FX-8350 8 core, 4.0GHz

    The details:

    FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
    Tested on: 4/27/2015 1:31:37 PM
    Score: 9913
    Average Frame Rate: 80.626
    Performance: Extremely High
    -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
    Loading Times by Scene
    Scene #1 1.595 sec
    Scene #2 6.573 sec
    Scene #3 5.652 sec
    Scene #4 4.837 sec
    Scene #5 4.594 sec
    Scene #6 1.877 sec
    Total Loading Time 25.132 sec

    Screen Size: 1920x1080
    Screen Mode: Borderless Windowed
    DirectX Version: 11
    Graphics Presets: Maximum
    General
    -Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
    -Occlusion Culling: Disabled
    -LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
    -Real-time Reflections: Highest Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
    -Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
    -Transparent Lighting Quality: High
    -Grass Quality: High
    -Background Tessellation: High Quality
    -Water Tessellation: High Quality
    Shadows
    -Self: Display
    -Other NPCs: Display
    Shadow Quality
    -LOD on Shadows: Disabled
    -Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
    -Shadow Cascading: Best
    -Shadow Softening: Strong
    Texture Detail
    -Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
    -Anisotropic Filtering: x16
    Movement Physics
    -Self: Full
    -Other NPCs: Full
    Effects
    -Limb Darkening: Enabled
    -Radial Blur: Enabled
    -Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: High Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
    -Glare: Normal
    Cinematic Cutscenes
    -Depth of Field: Enabled

    System
    Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.150316-1654)
    AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor
    8141.500MB
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (VRAM 3072 MB) 9.18.0013.4788


    (0)
    Last edited by Ditto; 04-28-2015 at 04:16 AM.

  6. #156
    Player
    VTanner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    48
    Character
    Soulstar Extremis
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaSnowfield View Post
    And im getting between 55-57 fps with 7k score? meanwhile some people with a Celeron D and a GT 5200 are getting over 80 fps on 1080p...

    To me the first thing that look very odd with your result is the graph. Just go take a look at anyone else here and you should be able to notice that they sort of go up and down "normally" for lack of a better word. Yours on the other-hand is just straight up top or bottom, and to me instantly looks like major stuttering or the GPU is being throttled (and in turn reducing it's speed) then going full bought and then back to nothing. I wouldn't say this is an issue with the benchmark being unreliable more that something seems off with your setup either in temps/power or drivers. Either way you have a bad score for a 980 (good PC specs) and a very strange performance graph.

    Oh please don't take this a negative post it's just with what your saying and what shown it looks like somethings just not right.
    (0)

  7. #157
    Player
    Teprague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    1
    Character
    Ichigo Zangetsu
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50

    Benchmark, gtx 970 sli ( sli does work had msi afterburner on to confirm )

    (1)

  8. #158
    Player
    Nekodar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    2,104
    Character
    Nyaano Nohea
    World
    Midgardsormr
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaSnowfield View Post
    Okay this must be a **** joke

    System expect :

    I7 4790k 4.0 Ghz
    Evga GTX 980 SC
    SSD Samsung PRO 850 256GB.
    Asus Maximus Ranger VII
    Drivers updated.

    And im getting between 55-57 fps with 7k score? meanwhile some people with a Celeron D and a GT 5200 are getting over 80 fps on 1080p...

    Looks a bit low... But you're using custom settings so can't really compare properly.
    How much RAM? RAM speed?

    You might want to check your GPU temperatures while running this as well. Graph indicates lots of throttling which could mean that the GPU runs too hot.
    Could try to downclock to stock settings as you have a factory OC card and the OC might not be stable with drivers newer than it was designed for.
    (0)
    Last edited by Nekodar; 04-28-2015 at 04:16 AM.

  9. #159
    Player
    AkashiXI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    772
    Character
    Akashi Mousai
    World
    Adamantoise
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 90
    I'm honestly very surprised I managed to get this high of a number, compared to what the 970 users are getting. This is with a very outdated driver too (2013 driver build)


    Hopefully this'll encourage other 700 builds not to immediately upgrade... pretty content with this tbh.

    Other info:

    FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
    Tested on: 4/27/2015 2:11:47 PM
    Score: 8145
    Average Frame Rate: 63.289
    Performance: Extremely High
    -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
    Loading Times by Scene
    Scene #1 2.454 sec
    Scene #2 10.161 sec
    Scene #3 5.745 sec
    Scene #4 5.493 sec
    Scene #5 5.111 sec
    Scene #6 2.490 sec
    Total Loading Time 31.457 sec

    DAT:s20150427141147.dat

    Screen Size: 1920x1080
    Screen Mode: Full Screen
    DirectX Version: 11
    Graphics Presets: Maximum
    General
    -Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
    -Occlusion Culling: Disabled
    -LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
    -Real-time Reflections: Highest Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
    -Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
    -Transparent Lighting Quality: High
    -Grass Quality: High
    -Background Tessellation: High Quality
    -Water Tessellation: High Quality
    Shadows
    -Self: Display
    -Other NPCs: Display
    Shadow Quality
    -LOD on Shadows: Disabled
    (0)

  10. #160
    Player BristolRuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    518
    Character
    J'azih Dahj
    World
    Moogle
    Main Class
    Dragoon Lv 100


    FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
    Tested on: 27/04/2015 20:10:46
    Score: 13971
    Average Frame Rate: 108.699
    Performance: Extremely High
    -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
    Loading Times by Scene
    Scene #1 0.979 sec
    Scene #2 4.664 sec
    Scene #3 3.634 sec
    Scene #4 3.612 sec
    Scene #5 3.520 sec
    Scene #6 1.501 sec
    Total Loading Time 17.910 sec
    (0)

Page 16 of 35 FirstFirst ... 6 14 15 16 17 18 26 ... LastLast