healing question

[RenoSinclair]

for end game runs which healer is more efficiant: SCH or WHM?

[sciondar]

From everything I've read and experienced they both bring their own benefits to end game content. It really just matters what you feel most comfortable with.

[CycLee]

try both and play what you are more comfortable with.

[RenoSinclair]

then i might stay Scholar ive been putting so much time into it and (even though im level 39 in it) im enjoying it

[IchirouHayami]

They done the job balancing quite well as they are both needed in end game content, like certain mechanics require An Adloquium and Stoneskin from both the whm and sch.

Also WHM brings the AOE healing whereas SCH is more catered to Single Target healing and burst healing and damage migitation.

So you require both in end game content.

[RenoSinclair]

so a question about the healing in perticular. do i absolutely need to cross class stone skin or will i be fine without it?

[CycLee]

as the time comes, it's suggested that you'll invest some time to get the CNJ to 34 - it's rly not that much of an effort. but more important are some lvl on the THM for swiftcast. not having the 10% stoneskin is just a minor drawback while swiftcast will prove often as a lifesaver

[Ghishlain]

so a question about the healing in perticular. do i absolutely need to cross class stone skin or will i be fine without it?

In content where you'll absolutely need Stoneskin, chances are there's a WHM there to use said Stoneskin.

In any other content, it's generally a nice "bonus" to have though finding times to apply Stoneskin as a SCH can be difficult depending on how quickly the party wants to progress.

[RenoSinclair]

i have swiftcast i leveled thm and blm to 50 before i started healing

[CycLee]

then you are fine have fun playing the lord over life and death