In the final resume, how heals are count?

[Geologo]

I saw a WHM healing for 600k of damage, I saw it just once but I really wonder if effectively the HP restored consider even the overhealing (healing a player that is already capped)

Even because if it is not counted (as I aim) the sum of the Damage Dealt by all should be similar to the sum of the HP healed, but usually it seems very far from it :/

[Sunako]

Overheals count too. If you keep medica 2 and regen everybody you can easily do that mount healing. not need cast single cure for that.

[Buff_Archer]

Scholars don't have the same capacity to overheat the party as WHM's, so if you see a Scholar with 200k HP restored vs a WHM with 200k HP restored, it might mean the Scholar did much more productive healing. And of course, some things don't show on the scoreboard like removing negative statuses which is one of the most important things a healer can do. Had a secure match where we were very mobile in the game, and I had swapped to Scholar since we had no healers at the start, and after casting leeches to remove debuffs on this bard I'd followed over and over and over so he could DPS like he wanted, at the end after we won the match he was like 'You only healed like 70k HP that's terrible.' and left before I could tell him to go f- himself. Though in slaughter mode I'll typically heal as much as anybody on SCH and unlike in Secure tend to run low on HP with 3 alliances to heal.

[Sanghelios]

Yep, what Buff_Archer said is correct. A WHM can reach incredible amounts of healing, but most of that is just overhealing. Back in time when 72 man secure was a thing and your whole party was kinda always on flag i reached 500-600k with a vita build in almost every game. Just imagine how much you can heal when you cast a Divine Seal Medica 2 plus an active Level 3 Sacred Soil and 8 people are standing in that for half a minute and a few of them also do have a regen ticking on them while you casting some additional cures. A Scholar would never be able to reach those amounts.

[Buff_Archer]

Those were the good 'ole days, when we could have an extended 1 party vs 1 party battle vs. the travesty that's in place now. I miss 72 man secure mode, have not had a match like that once since slaughter mode was released.

Now it's 24 man secure mode and if your party is fighting another party at a flag, then the third party is gonna be running around getting all the objectives and winning. And of course 72 man slaughter is just a clusterf--- of 9 parties at mid, and even when there are the drone thingys at manors/markets/temple, it's not single party vs single party there either because those usually go to whoever shows up with a zerg train.