Which is more recommended to do? I know BLM has flare which is nice but WHM has Holy.


Which is more recommended to do? I know BLM has flare which is nice but WHM has Holy.


Scholar
/10char

I find WHM to be best for solo SB there. With your chocobo out you can indeed solo AOE it, Stoneskin + Regen also helps too. Not to mention the stun from Holy.
I've constantly been able to solo Urth's as WHM on my alt, not sure how BLM could pull it off unless picking off smaller groups, as the damage can stack up pretty quick depending on how much your SBing (taking the time to position/LoS them all for AoE). I suppose the choco heal could help but without stoneskin->holy stun I can't see how it would be faster.



For solo spiritbonding i'd go WHM. The sprites can do quite some damage if you pull a lot of them. Manaward can mitigate most of it, but it's safer to just go white mage.
Between BLM & WHM, I'd go WHM
Whm = cuz u can go full SB gear and kill off the sprites in 1 mega pull with PoM CS holy spam with SS up incase u go oom. Also given the fact tht u prebuffed urself with stoneskin and regen + medica.
If all else fails use benediction lol.
Blm = no healing = less chances of surviving mass pulls.
Any other classes = lol what,
Mass pull in full SB gear not gonna go well.
I feel bad for tanks that try to do solo mass pull cuz its just so slowwwwwwwwwww lol.
White Mage doesn't need to target anything to use their AoE, that combined with a larger AoE and stun makes them better.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote




