Quote Originally Posted by Preypacer View Post
You, in turn, suggest to your boss that you only work one 4 hour day, then have someone else work your other 12 hours for you... but that you still get the full $160 at the end of the week.

I hope you can see how your logic is so flawed, presented in that scenario - though I doubt you will.
Actually, just playing devils advocate again, your analogy is flawed because of the part that I'm quoting. From what I get from the idea of a plex system, person A doesn't have time to make gil. person B has a ton of gil. Person A pays for person B subscription in exchange for gil. Both "person's" win.

Now in your example, Person A works for person B, but only person B reaps the rewards. Why would person A work for person B but person B gets all the money? What does Person A get out of it in your example? Its a bad representation of what people are trying to explain about the plex system. Its just like solving a polynomial equation. What you do to one side of the equation, you must also do to other side.