This heavy status while on mount...

[Elusana_Celah]

Bunch of words

I don't believe some level 40-50 enemies that I can get off my mount and kill in 6 hits and be on my way should be affecting my movement anyways. The system needs to be based on the actual threat the enemy has on you. Even if I walk into the entirety of Sapsa Spawning Ground and aggro a ton of guys I can just get off and AE them while drinking a potion and using a heal spell if need be then be on my merry way, in fact I usually ignore 20 guys shooting at me and continue moving with heavy until the aggro resets and I'm still alive... Maybe if the game took into account the actual threat the enemy poses on you what you said would make sense.

I'm not suggesting we completely remove any sense of threat when riding past hoards of enemies but how about something that makes sense so it doesn't feel like SE is just trolling us by being annoying?

[Eul]

My favorite irritating debuff (which I usually avoid in case it's not silenced and now he dies in a few seconds anyway) is Kurrea's sleep...

My favourite one is Maahes's petrification with it's long duration

[dioxideUniversa]

Devs like wasting your time instead of giving you an incentive to stop and fight mobs.

[ChiiSoSeriouz]

The system needs to be based on the actual threat the enemy has on you.

The system is working as intended. If you can dismount and engage the enemy then do it?

I don't think me running past a sylph in Sylphlands that happens to hit me with thunder and I get a heavy then I continue running with that heavy status and her still hitting me until aggro wears off and heavy wears off and I'm still near full health constitutes "danger".

Because it's not dangerous. That's what i said.

there's no danger.

Please don't misquote me again.

[Elusana_Celah]

Please don't misquote me again.

Oops I guess I did misread what you said to a point. My apologies as you did mention that there is no danger and I wrote my entire rebuttal in regards to my misinterpretation of your post. It was not my intention to misquote you I'm just blind lol. Still my original point still stands. If it serves no purpose other than to 'annoy you' then why is it a feature at all?

[ChiiSoSeriouz]

It's all good, we'll just have to agree to disagree, no hard feelings. Your viewpoint is definitely strong as many others agree with you on this.

[Kaiser-Ace]

Maybe they should make the enemies actually scary then so we swerve to avoid them, rather than just infuriatingly annoying and completely harmless. :-p

Uuuuh, that'd make me MORE tempted to fire my Leroy Jenkins Macro and run right for it so I can say "Hey Guys I just totally PWNed that (Insert Giant Scarry Mob Here) Single Handedly!".

[MilesSaintboroguh]

Watch, come 3.0, we'll be level 60 and those mobs won't bother us anymore. Next we can then complain why a bunch of level 60 mobs are attacking us when we have gear levels hitting 200.

[Dreufo]

If you are using Stoneskin and receive ZERO damage you should not be hit by the corresponding status ailment.

Nuff' Said.

[Ninster]

Watch, come 3.0, we'll be level 60 and those mobs won't bother us anymore. Next we can then complain why a bunch of level 60 mobs are attacking us when we have gear levels hitting 200.

And with flying mounts? Bet we plummet to our deaths (get it? Heavy?) and have to respawn and make the trip all over again. Please look forward to it. >_>