BLM DPS!!!

[AniCelestine]

I saw people saying "if you have thundercloud proc + first starter proc -> Fire III - > Fire I -> Thunder III "

Please explain that please.

Because from my reasoning, since thunder cloud proc could happen every 3 sedond you have thunder applied on a target(s) so if you don't use it as soon as possible (assuming no movement required anytime soon, so no need to save it) you could potentionally loose a proc because you waited longer than 3 sec and got 2 thunder procs in row.

So, why would "Fire III -> (potentially losing a thunder proc) Fire I -> (potentionally losing a thunder proc, but could get a new fire proc) [Fire proc came so Fire III(based on the earlier Fire III procs > Fire I > Thunder III we're going to use fire I again](potentionally losing a thunder proc) -> Thunder III" be better than "Thunder III ->(potentionally a thunder proc) Fire III -> (potentionally a thunder proc) Fire I" if you are in a situation where you have both procs up.

Note: if you'd got the thunder proc right after you used thunder III proc, you'll already be casting your Fire III/Fire I(assuming you're following the "always be casting" guideline) before it registers to you, so you're mostlikely not going to be doing Thunder III -> Thunder III -> Thunder III and then losing your AF III stack and thus fucling up your rotation.