Gold Saucer outfits, gender locked?

[Ophie-Mio]

Or how about people quit with wanting to insert non-sensical content into this game. I pay to play a persistant online version of Final Fantasy by the vision of SEs' production/ delevopment teams, not a warped fan-service-esque version of how a small fraction of the playerbase want the game to be.

Ahhhh, yes, now bring forth the tanks in bikinis and let's still decide if this game isn't a fan-warped version of what the SE dev wanted.

You're in the wrong message board and in the wrong game if you think that all nonsensical content should be heavily censored and possibly not put in. Hildebrand would be the first to go if how you are is taken to the game at large.

This game is an MMO. If SE wanted it to be their vision completely, they would have done it like XI where there were no glamour options. What you wore was the look you had. People had town outfits for a sense of individuality. This MMO though, wants you to have individual freedom. If you wanna be a bikini snowman, go for it. SE has given you the tools to do so.

Your opinion here is so against what this game currently does in terms of its glamour system.

[KylePearlsand]

Well I gotta admit... That Male Elezen looks damn sexy in that outfit.

[ProfessorRainbow]

Bunny suit or Riot. - [ill even just take the ears please]
Females already got to wear the Bestman's suit as well as the bridesmaid outfit while males only got to wear the Bestman's suit. Its not fair to the male characters to keep giving females twice the options. I'm glad that the females get to wear both the Bunny and the Setzer outfit but now i think SE needs to do what's fair and give males a second option or at least make the bunny ear part be unisex. equal glamors! everyone should be able to dress how they want no matter how crazy it is! I'm sure the bunny boys can fit in nicely with the Naked snowmen.

[Hempen_Kecks]

I'd also appreciate male characters having access to the bunny outfit. I don't feel it's fair that masculine glamour sets are available to female characters while the reverse isn't true. Some points:

-Male characters in XIV already have access to outfits which are skimpy in a commendable display of equality; most of them are associated with the Coliseum and seem to have been designed for the explicit purpose of showing off a lot of skin. The outfit being too saucy isn't an excuse.

-Hildibrand cross-dresses for the purpose of a clever ruse. It's nearly successful! Imagine what would have happened to those earrings if he couldn't figure out how to put on that dress. On a lesser note, consider that his father walks around in his underwear all day, even doing battle. The outfit being too feminine isn't an excuse.

-There are multiple canon homosexual NPCs in game now, and officially-sanctioned Eternal Bond between characters of every race and gender. There's plenty of queers playing the game, too, myself included. The whole idea being "too gay" isn't really an excuse either.

I understand the outfit likely wasn't planned to be accessible to males, and it's likely more than a quick process to get it available to the male models, but can we please have a response from the Devs on this? Perhaps a later update?

[thunderbreak]

Not sure about the bunny one, but the Setzer one in the concept art is definitely FemRoe. I think... haha

I think those moon looking things on his coat is suppose to be button buckles? I hope they'll fix it or remove it cuz it's making the outfit fugly.

[Shikiseki]

Well, thou asked for it, thou shall receive



comes with 50% shinier skin too


But who cares about a bunny outfit if you have the Lominsian citizen gear!

[Oce]

Here's the deal:
With Setzer as M only, Bunny as F only, it made it seem like male characters were cool and important to FF lore and female characters were merely sex objects.
With Setzer as Unisex and Bunny as F only, it says that both male and female characters can be cool important FF characters, but only females can be sexy.
If both outfits are unisex (or have M/F versions), then everyone can be cool AND/OR sexy if they choose. No one is limited or left out.

^ This exactly, well said.

[Amelia_Pond_Behemoth]

The important question is will the bunny hood allow me to double my running speed?

[Zumi]

I think it has to do with the fact that you don't see many males wear a bunny outfit so they went with female only.

[Lukha]

I think it has to do with the fact that you don't see many males wear a bunny outfit so they went with female only.

And Setzer was male, so it should be fine to make his outfit male-only. You're missing the point by a mile here; gender locking gear is sexist, no matter what the reason. Not only is it sexist against male characters, who apparently aren't allowed to be sexy, it's sexist against female players, whom SE seems to be refusing to acknowledge might be playing their male characters for the same reasons everyone accepts that male players make pretty females.

No one wins here, except the jerks whose fragile sexuality can't handle anyone else being pandered to.