Quote Originally Posted by Miitan View Post
An entry doesn't suddenly become worthy of a prize just because someone else already has the prize in question. You're proposing that if somebody already has the prize, SE should give the prize to someone who didn't win just so they don't feel bad.
So you're suggesting that 100 out of those 110 people actually deserved to win, and the remaining 10 really did not. It looks like you really believe that there are set-in-stone criteria SE uses to judge every single screenshot's worth with 100% accuracy and fairness.