Wait as Default on Controllers

[Cutie_McSnuggles]

Try reading the thread and you may actually read why.

If 'you' read this thread you'll notice that it's asking for an option to change the default. Not to change the default for everyone. So... why are you against it?

[StouterTaru]

If 'you' read this thread you'll notice that it's asking for an option to change the default. Not to change the default for everyone. So... why are you against it?

If I could set the default to join, I could set my confirm button to turbo, and put a book on it while I wander off and do whatever else. I would much rather have the default as leave my cursor on what I'm doing already.

I've only had one accidental withdraw ever due to the pop up window. I was turning in multiple ixali quests using the turbo button and moving through the inventory to the turn in items. Window popped up while I was hitting the right arrow and had turbo confirm pressed.

[Tiggy]

You just undermined your own argument though--if this happened just last night, that means it's still possible to misclick, even with "Wait" as the default. So what is the point of even having Wait? It literally does nothing.

It's a different window.

Then why is that person bringing that up as an example here? In that case, it's just totally irrelevant to the situation, which is defaulting to wait in places where defaulting to wait actually happens...

It was just an example of a similar problem and how it happens often. The duty confirmation window until recently shared the same problem. I didn't think this was a leap see what I was getting at here.

If 'you' read this thread you'll notice that it's asking for an option to change the default. Not to change the default for everyone. So... why are you against it?

If you notice I said it to a quote where people just clearly don't get why it was added to begin with. Not against the option.

It still boggles the mind that anyone would be arguing against giving people more options in this game...

Boggles my mind that you can't see who what I quoted and responded to in terms of the broader argument. I never said a lack of options was bad. Did I? I explained why this was a good feature.

It's like people only read half of what I said.

[sarehptar]

Boggles my mind that you can't see who what I quoted and responded to in terms of the broader argument. I never said a lack of options was bad.

Was I even responding to you anymore? No.

My last point was a general comment that it seems bizarre to me that there even are "two sides" to this issue, given that what is being asked for here is an option, which makes any need for argument completely moot in the first place.

[Cutie_McSnuggles]

My last point was a general comment that it seems bizarre to me that there even are "two sides" to this issue, given that what is being asked for here is an option, which makes any need for argument completely moot in the first place.

LOL Also quoted for truth. And for making me laugh.

If you notice I said it to a quote where people just clearly don't get why it was added to begin with. Not against the option.

Also, sorry Tinggy. I'm just so used to being on the opposite side of discussions with you I automatically assume you don't agree with me. LOL

[Tiggy]

No offense taken McSnuggles. I tend to be an unpopular opinion panda.

Then I'm sorry, I didn't realize you were talking about the people who just didn't like the new change in general

Please read things more carefully to avoid confusion. I was making the same point and Mutemutt was backing it up.

[sarehptar]

Please read things more carefully to avoid confusion. I was making the same point and Mutemutt was backing it up.

Please don't confuse being talked about with being talked to. Just because I mentioned one small idea of yours in that last post to Mutemutt in which I apparently "went off" (your point about accidental withdrawal) does not mean that post was in any way, shape, or form addressed to you. Please read things more carefully to avoid confusion.