Thread: Patch 2.5 Preliminary Notes Discussion

Damn. I was going to post something about people crying about item level sync for high-level dungeons, but then someone beat me to it.

that "Most Gentlemanly" pose, isn't that male highlander pose? So all race will have this pose huh? :/

Oh hi Rush and Irina, I didn't know they scalped you guys and gave us your hair.

Originally Posted by Anemone_Valesti

Quality of life is great with this patch *nods*

Absolutely. I love it where I'm thinking "I wish I had x" turns up a few days later in the notes (e.g. search from GC supply list in timers)

With High level I could see them splitting it into two groups now. What they could of done is something like

Group 1: 80 Soldier, 20 poetic
The Wanderer's Palace
Amdapor Keep
Pharos Sirius
Copperbell Mines (Hard)
Haukke Manor (Hard)
The Lost City of Amdapor
Halatali (Hard)
Brayflox's Longstop (Hard)

Group 2:40 Soldier, 10 Poetics
Hullbreaker Isle
The Tam-Tara Deepcroft (Hard)
The Stone Vigil (Hard)
Snowcloak
Sastasha (Hard)
The Sunken Temple of Qarn (Hard)

Basically having the older dungeons have the perk of having a higher soldier/poetic gain while the 2nd group would have a small gain but in a way it plays off that risk factor that if you want the extra reward you may get into the dungeons that offer more poetic/soldier or you may not.

That would be horrible lol. Low Levels are too easily speedran in 110 gear. "difficulty" should be awarded with greater gear .

Party Role Requirements
Parties matched automatically via the Duty Finder will comprise 1 tank, 2 healers, and 5 DPS. Parties formed prior to registration must also meet these role requirements.

Does this mean SE is enforcing 1 tank 8 man parties or will it still be plausible to mt/ot 8 man parties?

Originally Posted by Avyiur

Does this mean SE is enforcing 1 tank 8 man parties or will it still be plausible to mt/ot 8 man parties?

They already did that in ST. Only way to go with another composition would be with a full premade alliance.