Is it true?

[darkstarpoet1]

Personally I think comparing a video game economy to real life is genius, although there really isn't much of an auto market, health care industry or housing market.

Oh, wait, I take back the genius comment.

what another personal troll attack from you as normal. why is it not suprising coming from you? i'm NOT the one that brought up the real world market into the conversation. i just responded to another post that did, but feel free to troll away as much as you want.

lol sure, you know that what you are saying is Utopian right? even a world w\o violence and wars would be great.....
I'm sure you know why, a system like that couldnt last....


It seems that you are pissed about the seer's, maybe because you are weaver, but immagine SE will give us a new 30's mage set (thats not so unlikely), that is stronger then the seer's.... every weaver would get a profit, or at least try to do some money from it....

but if all of us were weavers.... then that new item would give, to the game economy, the same problem of the seer's.

If SE want that, why not eliminate the market... and let us sell and buy only from NPC like an offline game.....

you're right that is utopian society and would never work. it's what they are trying to make work here though and as we see in the in game economy it doesn't work even in a game either.

i used the seer's as an example because it is a r30 piece of gear. even with class mastery all people with weaver ranked now would still be able to make the r30 gear. in other words, mastery would not solve the issue at all.

you say it would give the same problem as the seer's if every weaver could make it. i don't think being able to buy and sell an item is anywhere near the same problem as getting an item that you cannot make, buy, or sell. remember those items are unique and untradable. the unique and untradable items are what hurts the economy because when it comes into the market it can never be sold.