flawed warning

[Niwashi]

Sorry Feng, but maybe you shouldn't have shared something that cost you $20 with a random. >.>

But he didn't. He considered sharing it with a random, but then backed out. There's no excuse for them having downgraded something he paid real money for just because of something he considered doing but then didn't.

Actually, there's no excuse for not getting the items you pay for regardless. Getting the lowest common denominator for the ceremony itself makes some sense, as you can't really have the two get different ceremonies, but each one of them should get the items they paid for (or didn't as the case may be) regardless.

[Nyalia]

For the people who have been affected by things like this, has SE offered any sort of restitution? If not, you may want to start collecting info for a Class Action Lawsuit against SE. These practices seem to be Working As Intended since they will not respond to any of these threads after several days, and these practices are definitely illegal.

[Noxifer]

if i selected not to go through with it, it should not have downgraded me. it ignored my decision not to continue. which feels well...shitty, and not at all something that should happen. if a prompt window pops up, and you click no to proceeding, it shouldnt just decide to so it anyways.

That's like clicking "no" when the dungeon/roulette queue pops, but you get thrown into the dungeon anyway because the other 3/7/23 people clicked "yes".