Different endgame, can we have it?

[Daniolaut]

For the last 3-4 major patches, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 respectively we've been subjected to major spamming of:

-Coil (1,2, Final)
-Crystal Tower (Labyrinth of the Ancients, Syrcus Tower, and Final Tower)
-Dungeons (3 Expert dungeons per patch)
-Primals (2-3 different primals per major patch)

Why cant the dev team add something that already exists since Hunts failed so hard?

Leves

are already behind a daily timer, would be very easy to add endgame leves that grant daily tomes. 10 old tomes, 5 weekly tomes per leve seems reasonable.

Can even scale it. Soloable the leve grants 5 and 1, with a light party to a full party the leve difficulty increases from 5/1, 6/2, 7/3, 10/5 (i think there are only 4 settings idr but you get the idea.

Guildhests

Light party and full party guildhests. Similar to Skirmish difficulty in 1.0.

These can grant materia, gil, the current unlocked tomes.

These things can break up the monotony of doing the same content over and over and over.

The more the merrier right?

[Squintina]

As a person who prefers leves and guildhests to raids and dungeons, I support this. Let's bring some diversity for the end game content.

[magdahmhara]

I like this!

[Nicobo]

...Why cant the dev team add something that already exists since Hunts failed so hard?...

Maybe Ixali beastmen daily quests (Encatl Sealant) was what added?... ^^;
Since patch I play those 6quests everyday, in fact it is a tedious task, but it has very good return so I keep doing it.
Therefore for you suggestion, simply add Encatl Sealant as Leve reward, then everyone will do all Leve allowances daily, players are very realistic.

[ThirdChild_ZKI]

You know, in a different thread in the Dungeons section, I suggested the idea of Expert Guildhests, primarily as an alternative to dungeons (as a happy compromise for the speed running types). They don't need to give EVERYTHING, but rewards should be proportionate enough to be a viable alternative to dungeons and the like, without eclipsing them altogether.

Knowing that SE does in fact take such threads into consideration, my message to them is to seriously review this and give it consideration.