"Binding"... why not "Bound"?

[Bebekurenai]

With the 1% on glamour items I will retract and say "my bad", and you were right.
Then again, I am sorry that you still can't understand my point. I mean a grammar issue, not a game mechanics issue. Although spiritbonding and binding are linked and one depends on the other, the term "binding" which you can see on the upper part of an item window refers to the verb "to bind" and currently has an incorrect use as the item is already fully bound to the character and cannot be traded. If it has 1%, 0% or 100% spiritbond (verb "to spiritond", not "to spiritbind") it matters not, it is bound and you cannot put it on the market boards and therefore should be shown as "bound", not "binding".

Please don't hate me, I am not trying to fight you, I'm just trying to explain what I'm saying here

[DarkmoonVael]

With the 1% on glamour items I will retract and say "my bad", and you were right.
Then again, I am sorry that you still can't understand my point. I mean a grammar issue, not a game mechanics issue. Although spiritbonding and binding are linked and one depends on the other, the term "binding" which you can see on the upper part of an item window refers to the verb "to bind" and currently has an incorrect use as the item is already fully bound to the character and cannot be traded. If it has 1%, 0% or 100% spiritbond (verb "to spiritond", not "to spiritbind") it matters not, it is bound and you cannot put it on the market boards and therefore should be shown as "bound", not "binding".

Please don't hate me, I am not trying to fight you, I'm just trying to explain what I'm saying here

No worries Other than having an offical response, this may be an issue where you never get a satisfactory answer . Best of luck anyway