Please, give us hunts back :(

[ChibiChan_Hyperion]

The question is why is 20 soldiery for an A rank all of sudden not worth the same as the same 20 soldiery before 2.4? What in the calculations has changed for people? It is not like people cared about the myth gear, many people just let sit capped at 2000.

Simple. Soldiery is no longer capped. Being capped to 450 a week made this rate perfectly acceptable. Now that it no longer is, we keep seeing these threads. The disparity between collecting Myth then (at the time, lesser tome) and collecting Soldiery now (now currently, lesser tome) is quite ridiculous.

[...] If they want hunts to be useful, make them claimable otherwise good riddance. [...]

How does this do anything to change the usefulness of hunts?

[MomomiMomi]

Simple. Soldiery is no longer capped. Being capped to 450 a week made this rate perfectly acceptable. Now that it no longer is, we keep seeing these threads. The disparity between collecting Myth then (at the time, lesser tome) and collecting Soldiery now (now currently, lesser tome) is quite ridiculous.

Really only applies to armor, since the cost of everything else bought with soldiery is, or is near, 50% cheaper.

[NyarukoW]

... Being capped to 450 a week made this rate perfectly acceptable....

Well soldiery is not the issue. More will not change that. The issue is that it is missing poetics. I like hunts like it was, but I like dungeons more. But it looks like poetics are low across the board compared to how soldiery was even before the hunts. I think this is intentional on the part of SE.

Right now when you hunt you get allied seals and soldiery, so if your getting soldiery gear, this is actually 2x soldiery in a sense. For sands and oils, ST is faster and better place now by far. And CT at 100 soldiery is probably fastest for soldiery if efficiency is all you care about.