Fang shui, the tooth about the issue.

[Ashkendor]

Since this' rooted in the lore, they should not have said no to this one.

The lore just says Keepers in general have more pronounced fangs as compared to Seekers.

It doesn't say that every single last one of them has enormous, easily-visible fangs.

[BigPapaSmurf]

The lore just says Keepers in general have more pronounced fangs as compared to Seekers.

It doesn't say that every single last one of them has enormous, easily-visible fangs.

Those can't even be called fangs though is the thing (in the bad example), they're just not perfectly straight teeth.

Besides, my major point being they've said no to enough of the popularly requested features in this department already.

[gamesmart]

Those can't even be called fangs though is the thing (in the bad example), they're just not perfectly straight teeth.

Besides, my major point being they've said no to enough of the popularly requested features in this department already.

Your "major point" doesn't factor in the development resources that would be needed to pull off some of those requested features. That's a pretty big factor from the development standpoint, it all goes back to cost efficiency. What's the point of making a change that not everyone wants and might end up blowing up in your face, especially if it can take a significant amount of time to implement?