I would like that.
If you are lvl 50 i believe you can equip like 3 maybe 4 acc.. If they would make it that there are no slot costs but you can max equip like 6 then you would still have more equiped then with the slot cost :-)

I would like that.
If you are lvl 50 i believe you can equip like 3 maybe 4 acc.. If they would make it that there are no slot costs but you can max equip like 6 then you would still have more equiped then with the slot cost :-)



I have all the slots, I want to fill them. I wanna wear jewelry and see my jewelry. I became a goldsmith because i LOVE accessories. But with current gear and the equipping limitation, rings are the best thing to wear for whatever I'm doing, so I can never see myself wearing earrings and bracelets and a necklace...
I don't see why they can't just let us fill all slots and NOT increase their effectiveness. It doesn't make any sense at all. One of the biggest complaints about the slot cost was that we can't ever fill all slots.
I WANT ALL SLOTS TO STAY AND I WANT TO FILL ALL SLOTS!!
I do not believe they will remove slots.Each slot is geared twards a specific role. Earrings elemental def/eva, rings stat boosts/acc... etc. What i think will happen as some have speculated is just limit how many can be equipped. 5 out of 9 as an example. Some stated it was the same as the point system.. but i beg to differ. Under the old system as a tank i could equip 2 mithril wristlets and a mithril chocker(for def). and that filled my points up. The advantage of the new system would be that a level 1 item is no different than a level 50 item when it comes to equipping. How many of you equip 4 silver rings instead of 3 electrum rings? The point system was limiting and counter productive. Keeping all the slots will still allow you to customize your stats depending on what job you play.



I said I don't want EITHER one of those. If they're talking about removing slots, I don't want that. If they're talking about limiting slot use (its still slot cost, isnt it?), I don't want that either. They're talking about boosting effectiveness of accessories to make up for it; but I don't see why they can't allow us to fill all the slots and compensate by NOT boosting the effectiveness of accessories.I do not believe they will remove slots.Each slot is geared twards a specific role. Earrings elemental def/eva, rings stat boosts/acc... etc. What i think will happen as some have speculated is just limit how many can be equipped. 5 out of 9 as an example. Some stated it was the same as the point system.. but i beg to differ. Under the old system as a tank i could equip 2 mithril wristlets and a mithril chocker(for def). and that filled my points up. The advantage of the new system would be that a level 1 item is no different than a level 50 item when it comes to equipping. How many of you equip 4 silver rings instead of 3 electrum rings? The point system was limiting and counter productive. Keeping all the slots will still allow you to customize your stats depending on what job you play.
I think SE missed the point people were trying to make when arguing to get rid of Slot Cost....



You can bet on this...i can't see ANYTHING that is enough of an excuse for such change...
Even "Because FFXI was like this" isn't enough! I want to be free to choose which slots i want accessories equipped WITHOUT being penalized for not having something equipped in a certain slot...
I beg SE pardon of the word...but this is one of the stupidiest decisions this dev team took since they went in charge.
Can i have Tanaka back now? ; ;



I can't say I want Tanaka back, but I agree with the rest of your post.You can bet on this...i can't see ANYTHING that is enough of an excuse for such change...
Even "Because FFXI was like this" isn't enough! I want to be free to choose which slots i want accessories equipped WITHOUT being penalized for not having something equipped in a certain slot...
I beg SE pardon of the word...but this is one of the stupidiest decisions this dev team took since they went in charge.
Can i have Tanaka back now? ; ;
lol this ^
Tanaka has always seemed very.... mm... confined to his own delusions of genius and not willing to modernize or freshen his own ideas.
i however agree that taking away Acc. slots is a little weird.
why is one limitation better than the other? its the same ish!
Last edited by Dreadnought; 09-09-2011 at 10:22 AM.
15 abilities each? what is this... Kindergarten?A jack of all trades WHM... what is this 1989?


I think SE missed the point when many users asked for "change for the better" and heard "Rape us senseless" instead.
inb4 stop whining, my opinion on the direction of this game is as valid as yours. :P Deal with it.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote






