You are absolutely correct, but I excluded a number of costs from every activity and just expressed the explicit costs. I don't have 20 hours to spend on gathering pricing data averaged among countries and regions to make a silly post! This took me about 15 minutes and I thought it would be fun to share, and I DON'T think that the costs are relatively super out of whack.
That's what the entertainment intensity figure is used for. Video games were assigned a 4, you would probably something much higher to a European vacation. This was accounted for.
Opportunity cost is relative among activities, the most classic example is going to college after high school or starting to work. You can compare the cost of those because they are mutually exclusive, meaning you can only do one or the other. Its a little more muddle and difficult to quickly express with entertainment, as there are soooo many other things you could do with leisure time.
Also, things aren't worth more a less depending on your income, they are just a less meaningful portion of your budget. Again, this circles back to the entertainment intensity figure. You also have to factor in resource limitations (like time and money). If you had unlimited resources then you would just do your higher entertainment intensity activity all day every day. It just identifies price discrepancies for activities you tend to take part in. It kind of helps you identify where you are getting the best bargain on your entertainment.
Let's look at your European vacation:
Cost: $15,000
Hours: 238 (2 weeks, sleeping 7 hours a day, assuming no travel at all, or that you enjoy the travel as much as the sight-seeing)
You would need to assign an intensity factor of 571.6 to have your vacation cost $0.11 per unit. Which is entirely feasible! Especially if you have 142.9 times as much fun in Europe as you do playing FFXIV!
Remember its all subjective and just a fun way to look at things!



Reply With Quote



