Results -9 to 0 of 58

Threaded View

  1. #30
    Player
    DefendPopPunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    768
    Character
    Carson Warson
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Carpenter Lv 68
    Quote Originally Posted by Xairos View Post
    That Eagleheart guy has the right of it. I am a stakeholder in Sony, as i have a ps3, but only in the area of having options. As an investor i would he a stakeholder for a monetary (and much more important) aspect. As a customer, I only have a stake insofar as having an option of a service. If Sony disappears, then I go elsewhere. No money lost as far as investments are concerned. That's is the difference i think he was alluding to. Its a semantic argument.
    Yeah, I saw this for what it was and that's why I didn't hinge the entire argument on the definition. Still, when you say something like "you're a stakeholder because you're a player?" as if it wasn't true, that's where I came in and said that that is wrong. Stakeholders come in all different flavors in terms of involvement, but I don't see how calling a customer a stakeholder (which is true) is something that is laughable.

    Regardless, it doesn't change the fact that I said the income statements are available for anyone to browse for whatever reason they wish, but then he wants to go into specifics about per unit costs and such, about which I never had anything to say in any of my posts. Well, initially I may have said his whole post, but what I meant was the blanket statements and absolutes. I do agree that per unit costs are not necessarily anyone's business, and I never argued against that.
    (3)
    Last edited by DefendPopPunk; 10-21-2014 at 08:01 AM.