Results -9 to 0 of 105

Threaded View

  1. #25
    Player
    AdamFyi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    973
    Character
    Adam Fylrmyn
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by chocomaid View Post
    Normal (default)
    Classic (optional)
    Advanced (optional)
    I would approve of this kind of option, but wouldn't it cause some confusion to some extent? Since everyone has different preferences, how would people differenciate between Fire II and Fira, given that Fire III was named Fira because it is a single-target attack?

    And I'm sure a lot of people would complain if the naming conventions were Fira (Fire II), Firaga (Fire III), and so forth. Since Fira would be an AoE and Firaga a single target, you'd get people who would be like, "yo se wai firaga no aoe laik fira? Fix plx"

    Of course, you could reverse it, but then you'd get people who would argue, "like yo se why firaga dose tiny damage than fira fix pls"

    The current naming convention is determined by the order you receive the spell. So I guess that doesn't overcomplicate things. They may need to completely rework the DoM classes if they were to change the current naming conventions. Other languages may have the -, -ra, -ga prefix, but according to their response, it is because it fits and makes sense in their respective language.
    (0)
    Last edited by AdamFyi; 10-15-2014 at 12:42 PM.