Results -9 to 0 of 105

Threaded View

  1. #9
    Player
    Dhex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,006
    Character
    Jadus Salaheem
    World
    Ultros
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Cynric View Post
    I'm sorry but you do realize the person you quoted is complaining about the response given not just the decision to keep the naming convention as I II III right? Every response you've given makes it seem like you aren't even reading the posts you're quoting or even the thread in general, you just seem to want to insult or incite arguments, that's really no way to go about being sociable you know.
    I'm really not reading any of the responses.

    -> Wait I just did - darn it all.

    Nobody cares~

    Quote Originally Posted by Mugiawara View Post
    They could at least give us an option. Those who like the original I II II spells can keep, then
    another side would be -ra, -ga etc.


    Let me add - I read their comment. Why does it need an option? You have macros where you can make up names for actions.



    It's literally already there.

    Hence; "are you blow-harding to blow hard" - because they are.

    -> /slap Cynric




    There you go - that why I said what I said now whine about it.
    (2)
    Last edited by Dhex; 10-15-2014 at 10:33 AM.