[dev1033] Class name changes -> Specialization/Talent Trees Into Classic FF Classes

[Seikninkuru]

There is a saying. never argue with a fool, he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

I'm not wasting my time making posts that people basically ignore every point I make and respond that they just don't like it and want absolute freedom. The ironic thing is people who post both that they want even more freedom from the current system than the insane amount it has, and also they want classes to have more definition. The fact some people can't understand why these are mutually exclusive proves I am wasting my time here.

Who wants to play a game with basically no rules? In a year, even slow levelers are going to have leveled all the classes to 50. Basically a big grind just so they can have a super character, that would be like everyone else. There are a few little individual snowflakes that will make a poor combination of abilities and expect to be able to join groups, and not be accepted because the only choice devs will have then is to make content based on the average gamer who is using the most powerful combo in the game. If content is designed for 8 people, it will be 8 people with the best or close to best combinations of skills. 8 snowflakes will have no hope of completing it.

The mindset of gamers today is so different than when I was young. Playing the original FF and DW games in elementary school, myself and my friends goals were to beat the game as fast as possible, at the lowest possible levels. We would replay them and try to beat each other in this way. This made games challenging because rather than grind yourself to god status and destroy everything, you had to actually pay attention. I'm not sure what point it became about grinding for grinding sake for most players, where time spent meant you were skilled, but this is another side of what a totally free system will allow. The most hardcore grinders will grind out all classes asap, putting everyone else into catch up mode so they can become viable for endgame. Players who don't enjoy spending time grinding repetitive bullshit will quit, and the people who stay will pat themselves on the back for being hardcore. If anyone complains at this point, the mouthbreathers who stayed will mock them and say they don't have skill.

If you want ultimate freedom, find some 13 year olds to play D&D with. I have little doubt that the new team is smart enough to realize how shitty of an idea it is though and from now on I will just enjoy the tears of those who make no actual content in their posts, but just whine and throw out slogans.

You are right, arguing with fools like yourself is a waste of time. Imposing your will on others is a great method of argument. It's really engrossing and helps people to grow.

D&D is so bad btw, that's why no one plays it... it gives the player freedom, how dare they not be forced into rigid roles with rigid restrictions because poor baby Siat failed art class and can't come up with a character on his own. Hopefully you'll quit before your illogical, irrational, and inane banter spreads to others.

[Siatdiat]

You are right, arguing with fools like yourself is a waste of time. Imposing your will on others is a great method of argument. It's really engrossing and helps people to grow.

Show me exactly how I have imposed my will on anyone? I may have obviously implied that through your posting have shown me you aren't very intelligent. However, I did back up my claims. Something that you have not done, and since you cannot understand me or back up your claims, you are left with getting butthurt and telling me I'm stupid. Trust me, what you say cannot offend me.

Let me explain something about an opinion. When you think of something, and consider it for yourself, that is an opinion. Once you bring it out to the light of day and share it with others, you are making a claim. An argument arises when two people have differing claims. Two people can have different opinions, but if neither claims it in public or to others, or if one claims something and then the other doesn't really care here, then an argument will not occur. In an argument, when trying to prove your point, the idea is to propose ideas that have 2 things. The first part of proposing in an argument is premises. Premises when applied allow you to reach a conclusion. Usually the conclusion is your original idea, so the way you discuss things with people like an intelligent human being is to find premises to support your idea. If your premises are true, and the logic follows through to a logical conclusion for that train of thought, then the argument is both valid, and sound. Now we are dealing more with inductive arguments here, so... this means we are dealing with probability. This means even I am not arguing for certainty, but am I using logical thought and a proper method of supporting my ideas so I am arguing for what is probable. I am saying this method is most likely the better one for making an engaging and balanced game.

You are also claiming your idea is better, but basically ignoring every argument I make and just saying "well its just my opinion." But it isnt your opinion, you are on an open forum on the internet making that opinion public, claiming its truth to people who will likely disagree, and then getting mad that I mock you for not making the first valid argument to support yourself.

D&D is so bad btw, that's why no one plays it... it gives the player freedom, how dare they not be forced into rigid roles with rigid restrictions because poor baby Siat failed art class and can't come up with a character on his own. Hopefully you'll quit before your illogical, irrational, and inane banter spreads to others.

Actually, to be accurate here, D&D does have classes and roles. It is nothing like you claim about not being forced into roles. The game is also moderated by a real person who can use reason to make decisions, versus a game that relies on what can sensibly be programmed into it. There is little comparison between any pen and paper role playing game, and a massive multiplayer online adventure game. However, we cannot judge the quality of D&D campaigns we have played because that is based on an individual GM and how they run that campaign. But I digress since mentioning D&D at all was me being sarcastic. It has little to do with the actual discussion at hand and shows your lack of comprehension of obvious sarcasm.

Ironically, I have been nothing but logical and rational in this discussion. Being rude does not equal being illogical, irrational, or inane. Also being rude does not equal me forcing anything on anyone. It is simply honest contempt for someone foolish ranting endlessly with no valid point.