Possible expansion SCH concern

[Volsung]

Its possible, though I'm not sure how to make a third fairy different enough to be worth
the implementation. I'm sure they could think of something to add some spice and variety
though.

Since they'll need to find ways to add more egi's for smn, the route they could easily take
at cap raise, would be to allow ACN a new summon spell (that would become a new fairy
for sch and a new egi for smn) and allow SMN to learn a summon as well (2 egis with 1 cap
raise)

[Laerune]

They could add a:

1. Defensive buff pet
2. Ranged dps pet
3. Melee Dps pet
4. Debuff pet.

They should remove silence from Selene and give it to the new debuff pet, Selene should get a buff spel, making her a full buff pet.


(Please SE, add male fairies).

[Zoeila]

They could add a:

1. Defensive buff pet
2. Ranged dps pet
3. Melee Dps pet
4. Debuff pet.

They should remove silence from Selene and give it to the new debuff pet, Selene should get a buff spel, making her a full buff pet.


(Please SE, add male fairies).

the thing about that selene having silence is that it is flavorful. selene is the goddess of the moon...the moon brings night and night brings silence. even her buffs could be said to symbolize phases of the moon. i think for helios an aoe crit buff would be both flavorful and relevant. the sun brings day and the day is louder than the night

[Dhex]

Screen shots were from data mine in Beta to show off some of the boss models we hadn't seen.


So... huh?

[Radacci]

Eos already has a mag def buff and Fey Illumination/Rouse that increase healing.
Selene has skill/spell-speed buffs.
so another defensive of buffer fairy, isn't really needed.
I'd like to see an attack fairy. You'd loose a fair bit of healing potential, so i think that's a fair trade.

[Nahara]

I think I would rather have more healing spells than another fairy (though a new fairy would still be appreciated, especially if it's a male fairy).

[Hyperia]

Whatever they do, I hope it is focused on healing and not on dps. I prefer to heal and if I wanted to dps, I would have rolled a dps class and not a healer.

[Lithera]

Whatever they do, I hope it is focused on healing and not on dps. I prefer to heal and if I wanted to dps, I would have rolled a dps class and not a healer.

I have to agree there...you put in a damage buff oriented fairy and there'd be a troupe of SCHs refusing to use any other fairy because of "teh leet deeps".

[Radacci]

Whatever they do, I hope it is focused on healing and not on dps. I prefer to heal and if I wanted to dps, I would have rolled a dps class and not a healer.

I have to agree there...you put in a damage buff oriented fairy and there'd be a troupe of SCHs refusing to use any other fairy because of "teh leet deeps".

WHM get Holy, so i don't see a problem with SCH getting a fairy that can attack...
Selene is already a damage buff oriented fairy, and the SCH still aren't going: omg i'm DD!
Don't confuse your own playstyle, with options for ppl that might want to do a little more damage, when they solo, or in some party situations.
If you're SCH main...doing Alex maps, FATEs or whatever, solo....can be quite a bother; getting a little bit of extra damage would be nice.

[Cynfael]

WHM get Holy, so i don't see a problem with SCH getting a fairy that can attack...
Selene is already a damage buff oriented fairy, and the SCH still aren't going: omg i'm DD!
Don't confuse your own playstyle, with options for ppl that might want to do a little more damage, when they solo, or in some party situations.
If you're SCH main...doing Alex maps, FATEs or whatever, solo....can be quite a bother; getting a little bit of extra damage would be nice.

Not to get too far off track, but SCH is the last class to need help with soloing.