A lot of people agree with him also.You can't find a difference between them.
As stated multiple times in the thread, what you think is a fact is just your own opinion.
People may agree with you, and people may not. And as you are now well aware after 16 pages, a lot of people disagree with you.
You expressed your opinion, people answered and you now know that you are the minority.
You say "I think classes are too similar", people say "no, they're not".
That's it, end of the story.
Before my time, Old Timer.
Besides, Imps were where it was at, with the occasional Mindflayer.
Some people just like the idea of classes having a really strong mechanics. But on the subject of current classes being identical? Not really.
The fact that a lot of people can answer the question "What DPS class do/don't you like to play?" is enough to say that no, classes are not the same.
I agree that the "combo" system is a strong part of the gameplay, but there are enough variation to it from a job to another that saying "they are the same" is not the opinion of the vast majority of players.
But, looking back at the whole thread, a lot of the "agreeing" messages were in the lines of "Yeah, ok, I get his point. But...".
So, no, there is not really a general consensus about his opinion.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.