While all of this is true I can think of one good reason to use lob/hawk over an uncomboed butcher/halone. Enmity is generated at the end of an animation, and lob/hawk have a much shorter animation
True, but even Overpower has a quicker animation, ~50% more enmity, and only costs 10 more TP.
XI: Zeroblade, Titan Server
I feel like smacking someone with me sch book in melee range.
I love the official forums, they tell you to use the search for thread about what you wanted to talk but when you use it they judge for necro a thread.
The only sensible reason (that I can attest to) to use Tomahawk/Shield Lob at melee or near-to-melee range is if you're chasing a mob and are worried that your melee attacks will be cancelled. Why not use Overpower/Flash? Well, both hit their respective areas, and may generate enmity on the wrong targets. Secondly, both do less damage than Tomahawk/Shield Lob, and Overpower takes more TP. Overpower/Flash can certainly be better alternatives to Tomahawk/Shield Lob in this situation (and they often are), but they're not always better.
Asking for this change is one of the more asinine things I've seen suggested in this forum. I see absolutely no reason to limit an ability for what amounts to no reason. It doesn't help gameplay, nor does anyone but the OP seem to care about the flavor "issues."
Last edited by Argyle_Darkheart; 09-21-2014 at 12:39 AM.
He just wants to use it in a macro.
Why should they change it? Do you want to prevent yourself from using it at a bad time? If so use a variation of this Macro instead:
/ac "Rage of Halone" <t>
/ac "Shield Lob" <t>
This simple Macro makes it so that when the target is within 3y of you it gets hit with a Rage of Halone and if it is outside of 3y you Shield Lob the target.
I honestly wouldn't have a problem with a range limitation with shield lob.
What I would really love is a trait that makes it bounce to 2 then 3 targets like so
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvSTxxOq6dg
Makes sense that different tanks would have different openers. Warrs are the aoe king give pallys the beastly opener.
How about we just agree that hallowed ground is beastly enough, on top of sentinel on top of bulwark on top of convalescence on top of rampart on top of tempered will on top of self stoneskin? I really don't think paladins need help.
Oh, and cover too. Can't forget cover >.>
I don't always pug, but when i do, it's with Pretty Ugly Guys
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.