Results 1 to 4 of 4

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Lienn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,949
    Character
    Lienn Deleene
    World
    Gungnir
    Main Class
    Alchemist Lv 50

    New company page update: armors missing requeriments.

    Those armors listed there also have class restriction. It also should be added there since that very same shield already tricked me once since it requires Disciple of War only.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Dev Team
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    223
    Quote Originally Posted by Lienn View Post
    Those armors listed there also have class restriction. It also should be added there since that very same shield already tricked me once since it requires Disciple of War only.
    Thanks for the post, Lienn. As this information was not in the source Japanese, it was not put into any of the other language versions when translated. Also, that means it is technically not a Localization issue, so I've written up a bug report suggesting that the class information be added, and sent it along to the Lodestone team.
    (10)

  3. #3
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,948
    Quote Originally Posted by Eemeefu View Post
    Thanks for the post, Lienn. As this information was not in the source Japanese, it was not put into any of the other language versions when translated. Also, that means it is technically not a Localization issue, so I've written up a bug report suggesting that the class information be added, and sent it along to the Lodestone team.
    Also, while perhaps intended, it's rather puzzling to see this shield be since only Gladiator can use it, when another shield identical in physical appearance is perfectly useable by DoMs.
    (0)

  4. #4
    Player
    Lienn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,949
    Character
    Lienn Deleene
    World
    Gungnir
    Main Class
    Alchemist Lv 50
    Whoops!

    Sorry then ^^: Thought it was a translation failure (like at NM announvement, where a staff mistakenly had numer of attacks: 2). But this does is correct...should've been posted at website bug forum...my bad! ; ;
    (0)