Please add clearance condition to Group Finder

[echoica]

There are lots of people who practice in progression that don't get the kill simply because of a bad group and not individual talent. There are also lots of bads who clear content simply because they had a good group and get carried. Having the clear achievement doesn't mean a thing.

[AdamFyi]

Honestly, I'm not against this feature if it gets implemented. I don't believe it would have a severe impact to most people except those who want free carries. People with clears but are not experienced can still get the boot. All this does it keep people from lying their way into a group.

[Xenor]

No need to type your Lodestone URL if you're on a PS4. Put it through a URL shortener like bit.ly next time you're on a browser and then you'll have way less to type.

[Ginga_K]

This is a "short-sighted" request.

Currently some dungeons are available thru PF parties only.
Thereafter, when it progress to DF, what happens?
If more players quit e game, where do you get cleared players for your PF?

[Leadleaf]

While I'm all for PF becoming less of a liar's game, merc'ing is a thing and one clear's not much guarantee the guy is up to scratch with the fight in the role he is, even if it was his clear job. If we're tinkering PF farms, give an option to lock that Need button.

[Fornix]

I don't think adding a clearance condition is going to do all that much in terms of succes. I've seen iLvL 100 titan ex "farm" runs end up in wipefests simply due to certain individuals messing up despite having cleared it previously.

What also doesn't help is the vast variety of tactics which can be applied in certain encounters, but which are far from compatible with each other. Depending on the way someone learned a fight, they may play perfectly well, but still cause a group wipe as positioning didn't match. The more players using a different set of tactics, the worse of a mess it becomes.

Best is to just forget about the PF if you want to do farm runs, and just create a pool of friends with who you can do them instead.

[SkylerStorm]

I don't see why people are so against this.

People always go on about being allowed to watch cutscenes, well if you made a PF for a story run of CM while watching cutscenes and proceeded to be joined by a bunch of speed runners who skip everything, wouldn't that annoy you?

It seems people only want the preferential treatment to be given to people at the lower end of the spectrum.

[Yoninxi]

I don't see why people are so against this.

People always go on about being allowed to watch cutscenes, well if you made a PF for a story run of CM while watching cutscenes and proceeded to be joined by a bunch of speed runners who skip everything, wouldn't that annoy you?

It seems people only want the preferential treatment to be given to people at the lower end of the spectrum.

Post of The thread

[NyarukoW]

..
It seems people only want the preferential treatment to be given to people at the lower end of the spectrum.

Yet who is it that will set the clearance conditions? The party master is looking for clear and only want people that have cleared it to carry them? Talk about hypocrisy at the most blatantly obvious.

And why shouldn't preferential treatment be given to those that need it? You must be against handicap accessible ramps and parking spaces too. And when the ship goes down, you must be like that South Korean ferry captains that bails first and leave all the students to drown below decks.

[Yoninxi]

wat

Uh check box should be checkable only if you have cleared it. That is kind of the poi t of the check box. Equating people that haven't cleared to handicapped people that need ramps? What 7 other people would want to pick up the slack for that 1 person that dies to everything cause its too hard with out 25% echo?