Hit Ragequitters in their pockets

[RygaenYuui]

It's like people have said in other threads. Trying to make it MORE punishing to keep someone who DOESN'T WANT TO BE THERE, in the instance, will not work. They will just afk til they get kicked, fake DC or whatever. It happens already as it is.

It's never going to stop people from being spoiled whiny pouting brats, no. But being lenient does not seem to be working very well either; If you didn't want to be there, then you shouldn't of queued in DF.

They should probably also add a penalty to the reason for being kicked as well. Like a vote kick for ragequitting so that a hungry horde of goobbue just completely devour their character including all of their gear right after they exit the duty.

How's that sound?

[Riviere]

It's never going to stop people from being spoiled whiny pouting brats, no. But being lenient does not seem to be working very well either; If you didn't want to be there, then you shouldn't of queued in DF.

They should probably also add a penalty to the reason for being kicked as well. Like a vote kick for ragequitting so that a hungry horde of goobbue just completely devour their character including all of their gear right after they exit the duty.

How's that sound?

Can we also add a penalty to people that suck so bad that make others ragequit? Say, 2 days without being able to use the DF?

[RygaenYuui]

Can we also add a penalty to people that suck so bad that make others ragequit? Say, 2 days without being able to use the DF?

I'd honestly be for this; For instance, why is it that so many DF parties still fail Titan HM?

I'm being led to the idea that the only real way to prevent either is just to run things with a competent static and forget DF queue altogether. Saves from the hassle of having to be inconvenienced by noobs who don't want to learn any better and noobs who think they're going to one shot a DF attempt on a certain fight and ragequit if it doesn't happen that way.