Well, I guess I was wrong about Brayflox.
I probably just didn't reach that level during beta 3.
Well, I guess I was wrong about Brayflox.
I probably just didn't reach that level during beta 3.
Sorry what? If a PLD is offtanking in T8, they aren't getting shield swipe procs. If you're talking about the 30 seconds he was holding a dreadknight, then sure I guess.
The main issue with Swipe as you said though, is that it relies on blocking. There are several fights that are exclusively magic damage, where Shield Swipe, Eye for an Eye, and untraited Protect are worthless - ADS, Ultima Weapon, and Ramuh (I think?). Sucks having buttons that are 100% worthless in those fights.
Excellent damage to cost ratio and TP preservation aside, the pacification effect is pretty meh. I say either buff it or remove it. When I say buff, I think it should be viable on a mob tanking. Shield swiping during big mob pulls seems to hold less weight than flashing or trying to gain more mp to be able to keep going. I'm suggesting that the pacification be made a user centered melee range aoe. Paladin shield swipe, mobs directly around him gets pacified and now the paladin is free from multiple aoes directly stacked at him/her for a bried period. Now the paladin can choose to keep generating aggro or attempt to cut the potential damage he's taking. Adjust pacification timers if this is too strong, add something to warrior if this is unfair.
They don't need to try again. See how fast your TP bleeds dry in fights without using it.
I spent half my post saying exactly that and he did exactly what you described. Bulwark is used to give near constant procs and it's a huge TP saver. He was full DPS spec which would help keep threat I guess.
It blows my mind how many people complain about a PLD dps move that (1) allows for a net gain in TP, something no other TP-costing attack for PLD can do... (2) has a higher potency than a comboed Savage Blade... (3) does not interrupt your combo. I couldn't give a flying eff about how most endgame stuff can't be pacified with the attack -- it's still the most valuable cost-to-benefit attack a PLD has when it procs and, unless you're having threat issues, should be used at every opportunity.
No they didn't.
http://mooglebox.com/ability/gladiator.php
http://mooglebox.com/ability/paladin.php
None of those abilities could pacify.
I think my problem with Shield Swipe is that it's a good ability but it doesn't feel good to use.
Keeping up maim + debuff route with Warrior -feels- good.
Paladin having like 1 + 1/3 of a combo route with Shield Swipe sort've existing as some byproduct of a half assed idea that we should actually be doing stuff with our shields just makes it feel like a class that was never executed properly. Does it work? Yes. Could it work and actually feel cool? Certainly yes.
Riot Blade -> Contagion (Lv 50 thm, transferred your debuffs to the target). This was before PLD existed, though. Riot Blade used to pacify you for like 10s. I think it even prevented Hellfire.No they didn't.
http://mooglebox.com/ability/gladiator.php
http://mooglebox.com/ability/paladin.php
None of those abilities could pacify.
I pretty much agree with this (except I don't think Shield Swipe is that good, lol). Gladiator, unlike THM or CNJ, has no two handed options. You're expected to be using a shield 100% of the time. Unfortunately we only have two abilities that really interact with our shields, and Shield Swipe is pretty underwhelming. Even though Shield Bash and Shield Lob require a shield equipped, they could just as easily not and the abilities wouldn't have to change at all.Paladin having like 1 + 1/3 of a combo route with Shield Swipe sort've existing as some byproduct of a half assed idea that we should actually be doing stuff with our shields just makes it feel like a class that was never executed properly. Does it work? Yes. Could it work and actually feel cool? Certainly yes.
Last edited by Brannigan; 09-06-2014 at 04:38 AM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.