Hello all!
As the title states, this is about our BiS shield. A lot of talk in a lot of different threads are going around about what is best and what is crap etc., etc..
From what I have found in scouring forums and what not the order is:
HA Kite
Noct Hoplon
Holy Shield Novus
This is what is out there. So why all the beef about Noct Hoplon being so terribad? HA Kite hands down is the best, iLVL wise, stat wise, even though you loose a smidge of acc for det. Also from what I have read for HS Novus, the current stat allocation idea is a split of 13 / 9, Parry/Acc. Which is understandable, attempting to get the HS Novus to mimic the HA Kite as much as possible.
My question is why is the Noct the red headed step child of the group? Take the HA Kite out of the equation, that is the end point, the goal shield to get. Again, we are pretty much all in agreement that it is the BiS.
So why prefer the HS Novus to Noct. Is it for that 76 extra block rate? Does that make that much of a difference? Some threads that argue the superiority of the Novus speak of parry not having that much of an effect. If this IS the case why meld it to the Novus?
I myself like parry, I see myself parry quite a bit. My Noct gives me "more" opportunity to parry, or so it seems.
Now understand I am not here stating as "the word" that NOCT IS TEH BESTS. I am here to discuss why so many don't consider it the second best to HA Kite, until you get it. Why do so many bash it and profess that Novus is the better shield to have? Making the BiS shield order this:
HA Kite
HS Novus
Noct Hoplon
Just for visual reasons, a comparison.
Thanks for your time and I look forward to a good discussion.
Syn