Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 545

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    ElHeggunte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    The Nation of Domination
    Posts
    1,468
    Character
    Naiyah Nanaya
    World
    Diabolos
    Main Class
    Monk Lv 100
    I can understand why people would be against a radar, but I never understood the obsession with hating on parsers. The only thing it does is read numbers off of your combat log in real time and displays them in a way that's easy to understand. You could do the same thing with a pen and paper if you sat there and scrolled through your combat log for an hour, the program just expedites the process. Otherwise, parsers don't typically display any information that wasn't already available.

    Every time someone is adamant in their stance against parsers I always imagine someone who's bitter about being kicked from a party because someone else parsed them and said they were underperforming. Parsers are useful. A few jerkasses using it in ways you might not like doesn't make the program itself bad and is no good reason to take it from everyone else.

    I don't personally use them (because I'm lazy), but more power to someone who wants to make regular use of them.
    (15)
    With this character's death, the thread of prophecy remains intact.

  2. #2
    Player
    KahnyaRedx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    40
    Character
    Kahnya Relix
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by ElHeggunte View Post
    I can understand why people would be against a radar, but I never understood the obsession with hating on parsers.
    People don't want other people to know they are bad, derp, can't perform a simple rotation, or slacking. Simple as that. The issue with catching someone using a parser is since it reads from memory, it's local to a user's computer. It may also parse log files, also local to the user's computer. The only way to catch this type of reading is illegally gaining access to the system and monitoring for it. Which mind you I said is illegal, and in my honest opinion, if it's on my computer, it's mine. They could have done all the counting on their own servers, but to save CPU and Memory, they chose to give it to the user's systems.

    Or you could always just look at the enmity bar to determine who's pushing the most dps, do a screenshot and pixel count. Go old school on it!.
    (5)

  3. #3
    Player
    DoubleT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Uldah
    Posts
    284
    Character
    Double Toker
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by KahnyaRedx View Post
    The only way to catch this type of reading is illegally gaining access to the system and monitoring for it. Which mind you I said is illega
    That's not exactly true. If SE were to put in a program that monitored what was going on in the background of your PC, they would just change the ToS an make you re-agree to it before being allowed to play, there-for legalizing anything they do. Diablo 3
    makes you agree to the ToS again almost every single time there is an update, because they would make some sort of small change to the ToS, thus making it a new contract that you have to sign.
    (0)

  4. #4
    Player
    Taban's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    213
    Character
    Taban Highwind
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleT View Post
    That's not exactly true. If SE were to put in a program that monitored what was going on in the background of your PC, they would just change the ToS an make you re-agree to it before being allowed to play, there-for legalizing anything they do. Diablo 3
    makes you agree to the ToS again almost every single time there is an update, because they would make some sort of small change to the ToS, thus making it a new contract that you have to sign.
    The EULA doesn't trump privacy law, just because they put it in the EULA doesn't mean they can do whatever they want to your PC. This was already gone over in a lawsuit with blizzard years ago, their Warden program used to do a much more invasive scan of your PC than it currently does, but Blizzard lost a lawsuit and now are only allowed to scan very specific things.
    (4)

  5. #5
    Player Mogi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    682
    Character
    Aria Tsuki
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by KahnyaRedx View Post
    People don't want other people to know they are bad, derp, can't perform a simple rotation, or slacking. Simple as that. The issue with catching someone using a parser is since it reads from memory, it's local to a user's computer. It may also parse log files, also local to the user's computer. The only way to catch this type of reading is illegally gaining access to the system and monitoring for it. Which mind you I said is illegal, and in my honest opinion, if it's on my computer, it's mine. They could have done all the counting on their own servers, but to save CPU and Memory, they chose to give it to the user's systems.

    Or you could always just look at the enmity bar to determine who's pushing the most dps, do a screenshot and pixel count. Go old school on it!.
    Sounds to me some ppl have to much time on there hands :P dose it matter who is doing the most?
    (2)

  6. #6
    Player
    Sapphic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2,308
    Character
    Sapphic Meow
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Monk Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by KahnyaRedx View Post
    Or you could always just look at the enmity bar to determine who's pushing the most dps, do a screenshot and pixel count. Go old school on it!.
    http://ffxiv.gamerescape.com/wiki/Quelling_Strikes

    Doesn't work. Also pets have a hidden enmity bar, so wouldn't work for SMN either as pets contribute a significant part of SMNs DPS. So BLM + BRD have quelling strikes, SMN has unregistered pet, just leaves MNK and DRG.
    (2)

  7. #7
    Player
    Elven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    303
    Character
    Arwyn Elven
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by ElHeggunte View Post
    Every time someone is adamant in their stance against parsers I always imagine someone who's bitter about being kicked from a party because someone else parsed them and said they were underperforming. Parsers are useful. A few jerkasses using it in ways you might not like doesn't make the program itself bad and is no good reason to take it from everyone else.

    I don't personally use them (because I'm lazy), but more power to someone who wants to make regular use of them.
    That's the whole point not wanting parsers, low dps last I checked wasn't against the rules people are so anal and prissy about it. However not talking about bad players that's a whole other issue they will always have problems even if their dps was fine but couldn't stay alive long enough to be of any use.
    (2)

  8. #8
    Player
    KahnyaRedx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    40
    Character
    Kahnya Relix
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Elven View Post
    That's the whole point not wanting parsers, low dps last I checked wasn't against the rules people are so anal and prissy about it. However not talking about bad players that's a whole other issue they will always have problems even if their dps was fine but couldn't stay alive long enough to be of any use.
    In a game with DPS checks, it's important to know you are producing enough DPS. So, if you don't want parsers to be relevant, SE will need to remove any and all DPS checks within the game. Problem Solved?

    As a quick note, if someone is "reported" to have low dps, I only ask questions, I attempt to help them up that dps. Some may be, for lack of a better word, mean about it. But not everyone, some people want to help. How can I help this person increase their DPS? Maybe they aren't using the right food, maybe the wrong rotation, or blowing their cool downs improperly, and they have no idea.
    (12)
    Last edited by KahnyaRedx; 08-09-2014 at 04:07 AM.

  9. #9
    Player
    Elven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    303
    Character
    Arwyn Elven
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by KahnyaRedx View Post
    In a game with DPS checks, it's important to know you are producing enough DPS. So, if you don't want parsers to be relevant, SE will need to remove any and all DPS checks within the game. Problem Solved?
    That's not what I said, A dragoon can give killer dps regardless of your skill same with a monk no parser needed but what happens in turn 5 and they keep dying will the parser tell you that one too? Inside an FC practicing no problem but then logic dictates you don't need to use this on pugs if you're using it to train in house right?
    (3)

  10. #10
    Player
    Asael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    146
    Character
    Asael Drakengard
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Elven View Post
    That's the whole point not wanting parsers, low dps last I checked wasn't against the rules people are so anal and prissy about it. However not talking about bad players that's a whole other issue they will always have problems even if their dps was fine but couldn't stay alive long enough to be of any use.
    Yeah, because if parsers were to all mysteriously disappear tomorrow that would fix your issue.

    Besides, you don't need parsers to know someone's dps is slacking as simple observation can do that, and then those same anal prissy people will still tell you that your dps sucks.

    Anyways, you can make the argument that low dps isn't against the rules (and you're right) but it's also not against the rules for them to not want to raid with you if they believe you will hold them back.
    (4)
    Last edited by Asael; 08-09-2014 at 04:25 AM. Reason: grammar

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast