When is an i100 item better than an i110? - I.E. ST Hands

[MythToken]

I literally posted in the post before your quote the priority #1 is to be a survivable tank which is inclusive to VIT and Defense... After a certain threshold though, they start showing less returns. What in the actual hell are you talking about lol? And when did I say i100 was BiS? All I'm saying is that it can be situationally better IE- you're the OT in T9 and just have to pick up golems but still need to dps

It absolutely is not situationally better. According to your own words. Job #1 is to survive Job #2 is to dps

Why on earth would you add DPS to the slots in which your most efficient survival stats come from, IE the chest piece with Defense, Vitality, and parry.

If you wanted to add dps which I am in complete agreement with, you would add it via accesories, after accesories if you wanted more DPS you would switch your Main stat to STR instead of VIT.

What you absolutely would not do, is have fending accessories be specced into Vitality, and then try to add DPS through LESS STR and marginally higher secondary stats on your CHEST ARMOR. Least thought out suggestion I have ever heard.

And no you did not say i100 is BiS. But you should be considering that, because if you look at the gains from accessories over your measly gains from a main chest piece, you would see that you would end up with less overall DPS stat weights.
AND less survivability, by an extremely large margin. (let me re emphasize how important DEF is to a tank.... ITS THE MOST IMPORTANT.)

You absolutely must look at what you are saying in a Big picture format, because that chest piece is not better than the i110. I would also ask that you stop spreading such misinformation on the forums.

One more hole in your statement while VIT shows diminishing returns, DEF does not.

P.S. you havn't beaten t9 so how would you know

P.S.S not trying to be a jerk, but people shouldn't use math to try to tell people things that are not true, its damaging to the community.