The fundamental problem with hunts

[Lamentations]

[QUOTE=Chocolate_Rain;2305963]

1) Soldiery does "not" need to be removed from hunts, your suggestion will only fish more rage, hunts need to be party force pop/claim for the umpteenth time, and they need to be locked at one pop per week, this "completely" eliminates all this lemming hunt zerg & blist BS, removing soldiery from hunts is "not" an option.

2) Number 1 already does this.

3) First you want soldiery removed from hunts, then you want logs bought with it, now we have two bad ideas.

4) I don't have a problem with this.

Your suggestions simply eliminate hunts as a common sense option for anything, this content can be fixed without tossing it out with the bathwater altogether, and telling me that I90 gear is there doesn't wash because I got that in days, people who want to grind GC gear for vanity will burn your sig at the stake.

Why should a seal cap be introduced to make it take longer to get I70 gear that is much more seal expensive to buy than I90 gear when people only want it for vanity most likely?, sorry this makes as much sense to me as SE having the prices reversed in the first place.

I90 gear sand I70 GC gear should have had prices switched anyway.

You are not suggesting choices here, you are "forcing" them, this is nothing but another bad fix suggestion list for an already bad situation, and again will simply make the rage over hunts worse, I don't understand why people keep asking for more rage.

This open world content everybody wanted didn't fit SEs existing content theme, was horribly implemented, and now we should make it irrelevant instead of fixing it right?, make them "force pop and capped per week", instead of more band-aids over a festering infection.