Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 88

Thread: SMN BIS 2.3

  1. #71
    Player
    RinchanNau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    238
    Character
    Rinchan Nau
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Dwill View Post
    It would be closer indeed as the difference would be ~1% if not less.
    yea. I used stat weights I found earlier in the thread... no idea if accurate. And the difference was less than .5 int. Would be interesting to see the actual results in a series of dummy tests. I don't have the gear to match both of these sets at current. But perhaps I can come up with a few similar sets.
    (0)

  2. #72
    Player Dwill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    915
    Character
    Elenath Lanthir
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by RinchanNau View Post
    yea. I used stat weights I found earlier in the thread... no idea if accurate. And the difference was less than .5 int. Would be interesting to see the actual results in a series of dummy tests. I don't have the gear to match both of these sets at current. But perhaps I can come up with a few similar sets.
    Stats weight for summoners are approximately, (These are from personal testing so they might be slightly different for other people):

    WD: ~6.57
    DET: ~0.28
    CRT: ~0.25
    SS: ~0.06
    (0)

  3. #73
    Player
    Havenchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    990
    Character
    Avalen Koma
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Dwill View Post
    Stats weight for summoners are approximately, (These are from personal testing so they might be slightly different for other people):

    WD: ~6.57
    DET: ~0.28
    CRT: ~0.25
    SS: ~0.06
    I think the SS is slightly higher .07 - .075 but I agree with the Crit increase being higher then what ariyala says.
    (0)

  4. #74
    Player
    Uninstall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    170
    Character
    Yukairi Ran
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 70
    It really sucks how much better each weapon upgrade is for physical DPS compared to casters. 2 damage out of 50 is way more than 2 damage out of 80.
    (0)

  5. #75
    Player
    Havenchild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    990
    Character
    Avalen Koma
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by skaterger View Post
    Ok so based on a pure numbers standpoint, you get 3 int, 2 WD and 15 crit for HA vs 31 det for BOS. If crit and det are approximately equal, that means 3 int + 2 WD is only slightly better than 16 det? It really seems like crit/det is pretty undervalued or WD really sucks for summoner.
    It would be better to disregard Crit in this comparison because both books have Crit and it's not a dependable stat to compare because of the minimal increase between the two books and the nature of Crits proccing. If we were to talk about direct damage modifier weights however, you would need about 45 DET to beat 2 WD + 3 INT.

    The fact that the BOS book has 31 DET which is about 2/3s of the way there, lines up with the minimal damage increase you can get from upgrading to the HA Book.

    Quote Originally Posted by skaterger View Post
    After getting my HA book, I was looking at the numbers in coil and it seemed that it hardly increased, if any at all from the Book of Spades. I thought it was definitely a mistake or a bug or something until I read this today. So I was intrigued and went to test on a training dummy and over the course of 30 dot ticks, the average tick from BB2M seemed to be around 360-400 per tick without food. The highest tick for HA was 415 whereas there was a tick from BOS at 482. I also did further testing of a 3 min rotation on a dummy and I hit 415 d[s with BOS and 420 dps with HA which was really shocking since an upgrade from i110 to HA was at least a 20-30 dps increase for other classes. So does this mean that det>crit and also what is the reason for the dots having the same/slightly higher tick than HA?
    This falls in line with what I was actually seeing in game as well. Putting the calculations of stat x weighs aside, in game I was also physically seeing higher DoT ticks with the BOS. Largely it shouldn't make sense for this but, this is in fact happening in game. This is why I also believe there's either a damage bug in play for DoTs with WD more then likely not affecting it or there's a slightly different equation at work here for DoTs which favors DET more, because its largely ONLY the DoTs that increase in damage from the BOS, everything else is stronger with the HA Book from my testing which would imply 31 DET > 2 WD + 3 INT for DoTs otherwise I can't think of another way to explain this discrepancy.

    Quote Originally Posted by RinchanNau View Post

    I do have a question about SMN that's probably been discussed plenty before. Is Miasma 2 really worth using with contagion? I have been using it most of the time but have thought about dropping it. The potency seemingly isn't worth the MP cost if it forces me to use energy drain over fester more than I would be otherwise.
    Miasma II is only worth using in an AoE situation with 3+ mobs imo or when couple'd with Contagion for the duration increase. If your using Energy Drain more then not, you should in fact examine your rotation a bit more. The only fight you should be having some MP issues, not counting any ressing, is T8 because that fight is quite long with no breaks in between.

    Perhaps you're over using Ruin II's (unquestionably the biggest mana drainer). You should only be using Ruin II during forced movement(Landslides, Twisters etcetc) or right before Fester comes off GCD.

    Or you could be clipping your DoTs too early, another culprit of heavy MP drain. Making the best of things like Bane for AoE situations saves you alot of MP as well so working with your party for those situations plays a big role also.
    (2)
    Last edited by Havenchild; 08-19-2014 at 09:04 PM.

  6. #76
    Player
    skaterger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    455
    Character
    Joanna Selenia
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Havenchild View Post
    This falls in line with what I was actually seeing in game as well. Putting the calculations of stat x weighs aside, in game I was also physically seeing higher DoT ticks with the BOS. Largely it shouldn't make sense for this but, this is in fact happening in game. This is why I also believe there's either a damage bug in play for DoTs with WD more then likely not affecting it or there's a slightly different equation at work here for DoTs which favors DET more, because its largely ONLY the DoTs that increase in damage from the BOS, everything else is stronger with the HA Book from my testing which would imply 31 DET > 2 WD + 3 INT for DoTs otherwise I can't think of another way to explain this discrepancy.
    What I still don't get is why only the dot portion seems to be affected. Since DET affects every single spell, including dots and fester, then by that logic both fester and dot ticks should be stronger for either HA or BOS, not one for each. If the results were consistent, I think it would be easier to make stat weightages for int, WD and det. The other possible explanation is that det has an additional bonus to dots while WD and int has a direct bonus to direct spells.
    (0)
    Last edited by skaterger; 08-20-2014 at 01:30 AM.

  7. 08-20-2014 03:01 AM
    Reason
    double post

  8. #77
    Player
    Judge_Xero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    2,228
    Character
    Divine Gate
    World
    Exodus
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 60
    Arg can't edit on phone.
    Compared to Fester of 900 damage. 1 damage = 0.11%
    (0)
    "I don't always drink beer, but when I do, it's often."
    Temp Forum Ban - July 7th 2016 *** I promise to never call out scrub players again due to it causing a toxic community

  9. #78
    Player Dwill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    915
    Character
    Elenath Lanthir
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by skaterger View Post
    What I still don't get is why only the dot portion seems to be affected. Since DET affects every single spell, including dots and fester, then by that logic both fester and dot ticks should be stronger for either HA or BOS, not one for each. If the results were consistent, I think it would be easier to make stat weightages for int, WD and det. The other possible explanation is that det has an additional bonus to dots while WD and int has a direct bonus to direct spells.
    Honestly, we'd need more than a few 3 minutes dummy tests to see the difference. You'd need at the very least a 1000 ticks of each DoTs with both book to really see the difference between both.
    (0)

  10. #79
    Player
    Sleigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,563
    Character
    Philia Felice
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Dwill View Post
    Honestly, we'd need more than a few 3 minutes dummy tests to see the difference. You'd need at the very least a 1000 ticks of each DoTs with both book to really see the difference between both.
    You don't need to do 1000s of ticks to see the min and max range of any DoT, though. The range isn't high enough, you'll get your min/max very quickly. Here's a few tests I did and it becomes quickly obvious what the range is after a few minutes:

    i110 book: 575 INT, 75 WD, 284 DET. Bio II ticks: 105 - 116. Bio ticks: 120 - 133. Wind Blade: 257 - 284. Ruin: 240 - 265.
    i115 book: 578 INT, 77 WD, 253 DET. Bio II ticks: 104 - 115. Bio ticks: 121 - 134. Wind Blade: 259 - 286. Ruin: 241 - 266.

    I also did a little testing on my BLM with low potency spells to see if DET was just stronger on weaker spells, but on burst damage spells the damage DET added multiplied with the potency (B2 = 50 potency, Scathe normal damage = 100 potency, damage range basically doubled).

    Regardless, i110 book isn't better than HA book in this case, but they're really, really close, perhaps a bit too close to get excited about for those who still have yet to get the book.
    (0)

  11. #80
    Player Dwill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    915
    Character
    Elenath Lanthir
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Sleigh View Post
    You don't need to do 1000s of ticks to see the min and max range of any DoT, though. The range isn't high enough, you'll get your min/max very quickly. Here's a few tests I did and it becomes quickly obvious what the range is after a few minutes:

    i110 book: 575 INT, 75 WD, 284 DET. Bio II ticks: 105 - 116. Bio ticks: 120 - 133. Wind Blade: 257 - 284. Ruin: 240 - 265.
    i115 book: 578 INT, 77 WD, 253 DET. Bio II ticks: 104 - 115. Bio ticks: 121 - 134. Wind Blade: 259 - 286. Ruin: 241 - 266.

    I also did a little testing on my BLM with low potency spells to see if DET was just stronger on weaker spells, but on burst damage spells the damage DET added multiplied with the potency (B2 = 50 potency, Scathe normal damage = 100 potency, damage range basically doubled).

    Regardless, i110 book isn't better than HA book in this case, but they're really, really close, perhaps a bit too close to get excited about for those who still have yet to get the book.
    Interesting. How long were your tests ?
    (0)

Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 LastLast