Force disconnection

[Darki]

Added security is added security. That's like saying I'm not going to install a lock on my door just because they will still be able to break in. If you are not using OTP, that is not a very wise decision. Also I have still yet to see if your reasoning how they could gain access to my account. If they already have your username and password (no OTP), they going to get on it eventually whether you actually on or not.

It is obvious you didn't read my post. I didn't say you shouldn't put a lock on your door. I'm saying you shouldn't have a door to begin with. Do you see the point now?

[Ephier]

It is obvious you didn't read my post. I didn't say you shouldn't put a lock on your door. I'm saying you shouldn't have a door to begin with. Do you see the point now?

Not really. You said that the force disconnection could be reverse engineered to gain access to an account. How so? They would already have to have access to your account to force disconnect you, so in that situation, you were already in trouble in the first place.

[Darki]

Not really. You said that the force disconnection could be reverse engineered to gain access to an account. How so? They would already have to have access to your account to force disconnect you, so in that situation, you were already in trouble in the first place.

If you ever take up a career in coding you'll see the problem. Here is an example: Ever seen one of those OTPs keychains? Not the software version i'm talking about the physical one. On the back is a static serial number that governs what the next 30 second password will be. Get one and you gain the other. Hacking is the art and science of taking a tiny amount of information and using it to gain more information. The amount of control we already have over our account is already a risk because of how much it interacts with our account from the internet. Adding an ability to control an active login would make things easier to hack. I personally would like to keep it as hard as possible.