permit FC queueing for Frontline

[Parz3val]

@Divinemight, there was a thing called Wolves Den prior to Frontlines' release... y'know.

[Divinemight]

@Divinemight, there was a thing called Wolves Den prior to Frontlines' release... y'know.

I am aware of that but do you aware of the following?

1. PvP experince has been increased more than 300%, (WD 2.2) 60 for winning to (Frontline 2.3) 600 and 20 for lossing to 300.
2. PvP action system has been improved: (WD 2.2) no pvp action if change GC to (Frontline 2.3) you keep all PvP actions as default.

Also showed you an exmaple of a Malestorm player who was ranked 39 and becomes a Rank 22 Twin Adders without much trouble. Keep going.... what is next?

[Parz3val]

I am aware of that but do you aware of the following?

1. PvP experince has been increased more than 300%, (WD 2.2) 60 for winning to (Frontline 2.3) 600 and 20 for lossing to 300.

1) it still takes an insane amount of time/effort to get to 40 regardless.
2) it still doesn't change how it's really uncool forcing us into the same GC as our friends when we dislike the respective GC & SE already went on record stating it would have next-to-no bearing which GC we chose to be a part of.

No they are not the same. You are aligned with the Maelstrom. Your FC is aligned with Twin Adders. Just because you work for your FC, does not mean you are aligned with Twin Adders..

Read it again, all of it.

FC's registration to a GC is an administrative choice, and not a military one.

Semantics. Administratively aligned or Militaristically, you're still siding with your known enemy... it's still an act of treason.

I do not agree with the ability to queue with whatever GC you or your friends feel like at the time.

I haven't asked for that.

[Fyce]

Semantics. Administratively aligned or Militaristically, you're still siding with your known enemy... it's still an act of treason.

GCs are not enemies.
They only are on the Frontlines, on Cartenau, which is under a very specific set of rules, and every three GCs had an agreement regarding this particular case.
Even then, they are not "enemies" per se, they are just competing for a power that would reinforce their military force to deal with the problems of their respective cities.
They deliberatly choose to fight for Cartenau rather than trying to "discuss" or to "buy" it.

Anyway, the difference between "administrative registration" and "military affiliation" is a big deal and does not just concerns semantics like you say.

GCs are sending soldiers from their own forces to fight for Cartenau. They're not sending FCs, because they don't have the power to ask them anything on a military level. That's basically it.