Private Chambers Preview [The Lodestone]

[Mogi]

I hope we have options to set which ranks of our FC's can or can't create a private room then!

This is what i was thinking i mean the master / owner must have that right to do so otherwise what be the point of owning a fc if you can't boot ppl :P

[Aphel]

In one of the live letters they answered, that you cant be kicked from a guild, while you have a chamber

and you cant leave your fc until you give up your chamber

So.... if a player buys a room and goes inactive for a year, you can't dismiss him?

[Erendis]

They said they wanted to make it (made it?) so that if FC house is not used for a certain amount of time it will be discarded. Maybe the same will apply to the chambers.

[Taika]

Furnishings
Players can place up to 50 furnishings in private chambers, with the ability to choose from among all furnishings available in the estate.

Wait, does this mean we can only pick the furniture for our room from the furniture already used in the house? ._.

[Kiroh]

Wait, does this mean we can only pick the furniture for our room from the furniture already used in the house? ._.

Placing a furnishing in private chambers will bind it to you, preventing future trade or sale to other players. Moreover, certain furnishings cannot be retrieved once placed, and will be permanently discarded upon removal.

Unless they plan on erasing furniture from the FC house if someone removes it from their private room, it's a safe bet they meant you can use FC furniture as well as your own.

[KinnisonArc]

This is an unusual way to implement the private chamber imo, I mean you can't kick that person if they own a room in the FC then this means when someone join your FC to harass the members but you can't kick them out because they already built a room in the FC to prevent themselves from getting kicked. Now its permission is a very important thing to consider similarly to the coffer.

Wouldn't it be much better if they make it so the room moves with the player when they leave/get kicked from the FC and then only able to access the room again if they rejoin a FC? Or retain the room but considered "abandoned" until the FC master assigns someone in FC to replace the ownership of the room. Any ways without locking members in that FC.

[Taeyee]

So it's a 1 time fee of 300k or 300k per room?

I'm guessing one room, one time fee, per character.

Wait, does this mean we can only pick the furniture for our room from the furniture already used in the house? ._.

I'm pretty sure you can but it'll probably be restricted to that one player. Says someone took a "Carbuncle Desk" and used it in there room, it'll be gone from the FC house and no one else can use it.

[Yarikh]

This is an unusual way to implement the private chamber imo, I mean you can't kick that person if they own a room in the FC then this means when someone join your FC to harass the members but you can't kick them out because they already built a room in the FC to prevent themselves from getting kicked. Now its permission is a very important thing to consider similarly to the coffer.

.

This, honestly is my main concern. I think the FC Master should still have the power to eject members with rooms from the FC. So it won't seem like troublemakers can hold an fc hostage.

[Umo]

I wonder where the instance will be...probably a door somewhere inside the house?

They already stated it's a door on first floor. You can even see it on Defenders of Eorzea video, alongside with new plants and furnishings inside the private chamber.

[Zaiken]

My question is what happens if you get kicked from a fc? What happens to your room/items and gil invested?

They said you can't be remove from the FC unless you remove all your Funiture and Private Chamer. So FC Leader can't kick you if you own a Room, it probably a bad design at the moment right now.