Results 1 to 10 of 15

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Cspr_Answrth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    127
    Character
    Caspar Ainsworth
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 50
    I've never had these arguments you're speaking of...

    If you want specific types of runs, make a Party Finder group, not a duty finder. You can isolate the same credentials in a PF that you want in your vote options.

    "Complete Run of Dungeon X"
    "Speed Run of Dungeon X"
    "Doing Dungeon X - no cutscenes"

    Also, if you are struggling to have these conversations as an FC, perhaps the FC should rethink their existence.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Darki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    348
    Character
    Dar'kai Krauser
    World
    Famfrit
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Cspr_Answrth View Post
    I've never had these arguments you're speaking of...

    If you want specific types of runs, make a Party Finder group, not a duty finder. You can isolate the same credentials in a PF that you want in your vote options.

    "Complete Run of Dungeon X"
    "Speed Run of Dungeon X"
    "Doing Dungeon X - no cutscenes"

    Also, if you are struggling to have these conversations as an FC, perhaps the FC should rethink their existence.
    If you have never been in one of the aforementioned arguments then I commend you for being more mature then most. However take a look at some of threads in the forums outside this one and you can see what I am talking about. Players need something iron clad to point to and say "ok. that is the plan then."
    As for the party finder, it has one big weakness: it only recruits players from your own server. if the duty finder had the check boxes like the party finder has, it would probably render much of my idea obsolete.

    Remember, FCs can have up to 512 members at once. That can get noisy. A multi-choice vote feature that the leader can whip out to cut through the noise would be very useful.
    (0)