Question regard Private Champer

[Shneibel]

Link to Private Champer Preview

Vacating Private Chambers
Players must be on free company property in order to vacate their private chambers. Moreover, private chambers must be vacated in order to leave a free company.
* Gil used to purchase private chambers will not be refunded.
* All furnishings must be removed before vacating private chambers.

as I understand, if a player have private champer, you cannot kick the person out of the FC ?

[Corfish]

I WANT to believe it's saying that a person must vacate the chamber to personally leave the FC (meaning they should still be able to be kicked). That said, SE has shown that they can be very odd with FCs before.

[KamikazeMan]

That's what it seems like. Unless they give FC leaders the option to remove a room from the FC house. If that isn't the case, I suggest only allowing people within trusted ranks to purchase rooms.

[Nuinn]

Lol, if that's the case it can cause some seriously hilarious drama where people will have to contact a GM to evict the baddie from their premises xD

[Genesis-xyx]

Sorry, driving me insane. Chamber*

[SavageWolf]

Sorry, driving me insane. Chamber*

They somehow mixed up their p with a b. Weird.

[Buff_Archer]

Also, what about decorations that are currently limited to 'one per Estate, lost I'd removed' like certain sofas and such. I'd like to put one in my room and would suck to have a conflict because 'Oh sorry it looks like SonofSatan_Voidsoul666 already has that same Vortex Couch you do, so that's why it won't let you. Because SE says there can only be one.

Or is that changing? I'm wondering if we're leaving the GC house to go to a new instance like with the Inn Room, and it wouldn't matter about uniqueness across the rest of the FC house.

[Alukah]

Also, what about decorations that are currently limited to 'one per Estate, lost I'd removed' like certain sofas and such. I'd like to put one in my room and would suck to have a conflict because 'Oh sorry it looks like SonofSatan_Voidsoul666 already has that same Vortex Couch you do, so that's why it won't let you. Because SE says there can only be one.

Or is that changing? I'm wondering if we're leaving the GC house to go to a new instance like with the Inn Room, and it wouldn't matter about uniqueness across the rest of the FC house.

Well if you think about it, there's a limit of 512 rooms per state + the house itself, do you really think they will keep a limit like that for 513 instances?

[Buff_Archer]

Well if you think about it, there's a limit of 512 rooms per state + the house itself, do you really think they will keep a limit like that for 513 instances?

Not intentionally... I think it depends on whether the code that checks whether an item intended to be a unique furnishing only looks across the interior of the house or it sees what in the add-on rooms. It could be that other code that exists for a completely different purpose needs to look across the main house and all the add-on rooms, so there's more than one reason this could potentially be an issue; on the other hand, maybe they took care of it. Would be nice to know so I can plan and not have a bunch of furniture I can't use, I guess we'll see.

I'm also guessing if an FC upgrades its house, all members with a room would have to pay 350k a second time for a new room, and would lose the furnishings that say 'once placed, cannot be removed without being destroyed' and that would just be retarded. If you were going to tear down a mansion and buy a new one after all, you wouldn't be like- Hmm I think moving this Tiffany chandelier shouldn't be allowed, it's meant to be a part of this place, I'd better smash it and buy a new one.

[Lithera]

The Rooms are separate entities so I'm sure there won't be conflicts.