Results -9 to 0 of 306

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player Dwill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    915
    Character
    Elenath Lanthir
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Malric View Post
    About as anecdotal and subjective as a parser determining a players skill as there is no parser that takes all variables of a given situation into play.
    You've already shown in a previous post that you barely knew what data a parser gathers so I don't really think you can make such a claim. Parsers are a tool that will give you valid data, gather statistics and the likes therefore makes it a tool which can give you an obective viewpoint.

    Quote Originally Posted by Malric View Post
    Yet you people get quiet as a mouse when presented with the idea of parsers that don't judge other people, just yourself.
    At this point, I think you're reading only what you want to read. I suggest going back a few pages as quite a few people have stated that such a parser would still be welcome. As for myself, I would rather have a parser that gathers all the data that the one currently available can as it gives you a much wider range of data to work with.


    Quote Originally Posted by Malric View Post
    I understand, a parser without e-peen enlargement isn't as attractive to elitists.

    Goes to show what you really want them for, which is why I will enjoy watching the ban-hammer drop each time one of you is caught using one.

    If you want your elitist bs, stay in PF & statics.
    You don't want the possibility of loss, stay the heck out of DF!

    Your post is full of bias and totally refuse to accept that a lot of people want parsers for various reasons. Some want one for themselves, some want one for their static group, some wants one for their DF/PF runs. And honestly, I don't see anything wrong with it.

    You might claim that people will get harassed or that people want one to be "elitists" yet refuse to provide any sort of objective argument or any sort of data/proof, you only provide a subjective viewpoint and anecdotal evidences which aren't any proof or data of anything. Tanks and healers are already subjective to harassement as of now, DPS aren't anything more special than tanks or healers that they deserve to not be criticize. And if it so happens that certain DPS gets harassed, it will be dealt with the same way as it is right now, via a report for Harassement.

    Quote Originally Posted by Malric View Post
    I'm not and I guarantee the majority of the game plus those at SE are not okay with parsers being used to kick people in DF.
    Tanks and healers are already subjected to harassement in DF. What about them then ? Again, DPS are not special snowflakes.

    Quote Originally Posted by Malric View Post
    It's funny that all you pro parsers use this same lame comeback.
    You're the one making the claims, the burden of proof falls upon you. So I suggest that you provide meaningful proofs to back up your claims. If all you're going to do though is continue with the same rhetoric, then you're only going to end up hurting your credibility much more than it already has.

    Quote Originally Posted by Viridiana View Post
    That's not true. DF has minimum ilvl requirements, and in some cases we can be confident that the ilvl required by DF is actually higher than what's required to clear the content.
    Agreed. Best exemple I can think of is Titan Extreme. I really don't see a full group of i67 killing him, which is the requirement for him.
    (2)
    Last edited by Dwill; 07-03-2014 at 09:08 PM.