You've already shown in a previous post that you barely knew what data a parser gathers so I don't really think you can make such a claim. Parsers are a tool that will give you valid data, gather statistics and the likes therefore makes it a tool which can give you an obective viewpoint.
At this point, I think you're reading only what you want to read. I suggest going back a few pages as quite a few people have stated that such a parser would still be welcome. As for myself, I would rather have a parser that gathers all the data that the one currently available can as it gives you a much wider range of data to work with.
Your post is full of bias and totally refuse to accept that a lot of people want parsers for various reasons. Some want one for themselves, some want one for their static group, some wants one for their DF/PF runs. And honestly, I don't see anything wrong with it.
You might claim that people will get harassed or that people want one to be "elitists" yet refuse to provide any sort of objective argument or any sort of data/proof, you only provide a subjective viewpoint and anecdotal evidences which aren't any proof or data of anything. Tanks and healers are already subjective to harassement as of now, DPS aren't anything more special than tanks or healers that they deserve to not be criticize. And if it so happens that certain DPS gets harassed, it will be dealt with the same way as it is right now, via a report for Harassement.
Tanks and healers are already subjected to harassement in DF. What about them then ? Again, DPS are not special snowflakes.
You're the one making the claims, the burden of proof falls upon you. So I suggest that you provide meaningful proofs to back up your claims. If all you're going to do though is continue with the same rhetoric, then you're only going to end up hurting your credibility much more than it already has.
Agreed. Best exemple I can think of is Titan Extreme. I really don't see a full group of i67 killing him, which is the requirement for him.