Results -9 to 0 of 82

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    OPneedNerfs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gridanian at heart
    Posts
    520
    Character
    Zyxt Fair
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Summoner Lv 90
    All these people who are in defense of the tank and flaming the OP, logic seems to bounce right off you people huh?

    The OP started off with a simple question of "Why are you using blood for blood? "

    If that in any way sounds offensive to you, don't bother replying, logic obviously bounces right off you.

    The OP was replied with a "why wouldn't I? It increases damage which increases enmity".

    The OP then tells the tank not to use that. Because gee, when the tank takes more damage, who has to take care of it? That's right, the healer. Who might that be in this case? OH RIGHT, THE OP.

    Now the reply immediately after the OP tells the TANK to stop using blood for blood because he's taking more damage from it, was a nice, short "you not to bright are you".

    For the slow ones, here's what a TANK is supposed to do.

    "Tanking" occurs when the unit is intended to be the one taking damage (typically by being dangerous or detrimental, or using a game mechanic that forces it to be targeted), and secondly, to ensure that they can survive this damage through sheer health points or mitigation.

    Sometimes I really wonder how people can make statements saying the OP was at fault even when:
    1. The names are censored.
    2. The facts are right there, even the way the sentences were worded.
    3. The tank obviously has no clue about his role and decided to be a smartass about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Scarletyoshi View Post
    Archer complains about tank using non optimal skill, admits to playing sub par on purpose because he'd rather chat with his LS. Who are we supposed to sympathize with again?
    The poor healer(OP) who has to deal with all that shite.
    (9)
    Last edited by OPneedNerfs; 06-16-2014 at 03:46 AM.